"The first family of Minnesota Blogging" - Mitch Berg, Shot in the Dark

Illuminating fun, faith,
family and foolishness.

“I have no doubt, none at all, that we are
in the midst of a global warming, or,
as I prefer to call it, spring.”

- Dick Cheney

Wednesday, November 30, 2005

Outlook 2003 is here! Pokes in the Eye With a Sharp Stick Also Available for Comparison!
Spend any length of time in the corporate world and you're sure to experience the eerie feeling of having the daily Dilbert cartoon mirror exactly something that's happening at your company that week. I'm used to it by now.

I wasn't prepared for yesterday's Shot in the Dark to pull off the same trick, however.

Today a cheery, encouraging email proclaiming "Outlook 2003 is here!" appeared in the in-boxes of my Division. Of course, an exclamation mark doesn't necessarily mean cheerful and encouraging (think, "The British are coming!" or "Wellstone!") but I know that's what my company had in mind. I really didn't need to see the email to know what was going on, however, because I could already hear the curses and screams of those around me who had already been "converted". (Like a New Orleans 9th Ward resident wondering where the buses are, I'm still awaiting "my turn").

In the meantime I can take comfort in Mitch's statement that there are some things — such as being eaten by rodents or receiving a PineSol colonic from Anna Nicole Smith — that are worse than Outlook.

Alternative Fuels?
Over the river and through the woods to Grandma's house last week took a four tanks of gasoline by the time we got home. Stopping for gas while on a trip often entails taking on bottled water or coffee refills as well. Ever wondered how much it would cost if your car ran on water or coffee instead of gasoline? Here's a useful table:



This is one of the interesting tidbits on the ConocoPhillips web-site detailing what factors go into gas prices. While ConocoPhillips would hardly be considered an unbiased resource, this page provides links to outside sources and studies that help explain the situation. The information is well organized and easy to understand if you're looking for a centralized resource on this topic.

One of the factors looked at is the impact of state taxes on gasoline (in addition to the 18.4 cents per gallon federal gasoline tax). The site offers both a map and list of gax taxes by state, and it may surprise you to know that Minnesota is around the middle of the pack nationwide at 22 cents per gallon (as of November, 2004), and lower than all of its neighboring states except Iowa.

HT: the Periodical and Amy Ridenour

Tuesday, November 29, 2005

The Hairy Otter Googles Fire; at least, I think that's what they said
I went to see Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire over the holiday weekend with my family and my sister-in-law and her two boys. It was definitely an action-packed movie, easily overcoming the slow-pacing problems of the first two movies. There were plenty of times when watching the first two movies in the series where I wanted to say, “Oh, just get on with it already!” These movies tried, perhaps, to be too faithful to the books. Granted there were a lot of characters and themes to introduce, but the first two were almost unwatchable. Prisoner of Azkaban was much better in this regard. With GOF, however, the problem has nearly reversed from the beginning of the series.

This time around the movie moves forward in sudden leaps that omit big chunks of the story. The omissions aren’t crucial to the story, but anyone who hasn’t read the book is likely to find themselves a bit confused as to why certain things happen, or at least ignorant of some of the backstory that makes certain scenes more significant. My nephews, who hadn’t read the book yet, enjoyed the movie but for them it was just one big action sequence and they were missed details that made GOF the best Potter book (IMO) so far.

Speaking of missing things, what is it with theater sound these days? The past few movies I’ve seen in a theater have been uncomfortably, even painfully, loud. It’s as if they want you to feel as well as hear the movie. What I feel like is that my ears are bleeding and my internal organs have been rearranged. When Tiger Lilly and I went to see Revenge of the Sith I actually staggered out to the lobby – after the previews and the opening minutes of the movie – to ask one of the attendants to have someone check out the sound level. I don’t know if it actually got turned down or not because my eardrums were numb before my third handful of popcorn. This trend continued with GOF, but even with the volume there were large sections of dialog that were the equivalent of an audio smudge to me. Perhaps it was a combination of my age, the background sound drowning out the actors, and the sloppy teenage diction and unfamiliar accents of the actors. I soon gave up saying, “What did they say?” to my daughter because she couldn’t hear me anyway. I guess I'll have to wait for it come out on DVD where I can turn on the subtitles. Given that I think the decrease in my audio acuity is due at least in part to the abuses of my younger years (cranked stereos and sitting front and center at rock concerts for so long that my ears rang for three days afterwards) I’ve got to wonder about the long-term (and even short-term) effects of this entertainment.

Are there other harmful effects of Harry Potter? I know there is quite a bit of debate in evangelical Christian circles about whether the Harry Potter books and movies are seductive evils that spur an interest in the occult. My position is that I’m completely in favor of parents deciding what is appropriate for their children to see or read. If a parent makes a decision that Harry Potter isn’t for his or her kids, I won’t criticize it. I’ve always been very protective in what kinds of books, music, television and movies my kids could be exposed to and I had my concerns about the Potter books when they first came out. After reading them, however, I didn’t think these were inappropriate for my kids who have more than a Sunday School foundation in spiritual matters. In fact, one of the things that I pointed out early on to them is the similarities we as Christian families share with the wizarding families in the books.

For example, we deal with “the world” in much the same way magical families deal with “Muggles”, and we can suffer the same mistreatment and mistrust as they do. We both have powers that others can’t or won’t tap into. We send our children to private schools where they learn how to develop and control these “powers” and we each have our own heroes, traditions and jargon that the Muggles/World can’t relate to, and we’re both aware there is a definite battle between good and evil. Even though my girls now beat me to reading the books as they come out, I continue to read each just to stay on top of things. I’ve also been blessed by reading resources that explore the Christian themes that can be found in the stories, such as Looking for God in Harry Potter, and I'll probably read The Gospel According to Harry Potter: Spirituality in the Stories of the World's Most Famous Seeker by Connie Neal as soon as I can get to it. (HT: LaShawn Barber).

Sunday, November 27, 2005

Filings: The true meaning of Christmas specials

Perhaps I was like Scrooge seeing Marley’s face on his door knocker, but I’m almost certain that when I watched the Charlie Brown Christmas special I heard Linus stand on stage and say:

And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree to render unto Caesar, and that all the world should shop and pay sales tax, and all went to be taxed, everyone into his own mall. And Joseph also went up from Shakopee, into Bloomington, unto the Mall of America, (which is called MOA) because he was an American, to shop with his wife Mary, they being great with debt. And so it was, that, while they were there, the items were purchased that needed to be delivered, and they brought forth their credit card, wrapped in promises to pay and laid it on the counter because there was no money in their checking account.

And there was in the same country stewards, abiding in their homes, keeping watch over their televisions by night. And lo, the commercials from Mammon came upon them and the glory of the goods shown round about them and they were sore afraid they would miss a good deal. And the commercial said unto them, “Fear not, for behold I bring you great tidings of a good economy, which shall be to all who do their part. For unto you is laid out this day, in a store near you, all manner of precious items, and this shall be a sign unto you: 40% off.” And suddenly there was within the commercial a multitude of friends and family praising their gifts and saying “Glory to the Giver with the highest credit card balance, and on earth peace, good will toward all, just $29.95.”


And it came to pass that I kept all these things and pondered them in my heart.

Fear not, for this is not going to be a complaint on how commercial Christmas has become. Frankly, those complaints have become as traditional and meaningless to most people as holly and ivy (if you don’t know what these represent, look it up). Complaining about how the true meaning of Christmas is being ignored, without actually dwelling on this meaning, is merely spiritual lip service; kind of like singing “Gloria In Excelsis Deo,” without knowing what it means. For me the issue is not that commercialism obscures the meaning of Christmas, but the cultural camouflage that diverts attention. As a case in point, let’s look at the Christmas specials we watch with our families.

Despite my parody of the Linus speech earlier, the Charlie Brown Christmas special is a classic and a true Christmas special because it is one of the few that deals specifically with the birth of Christ. “The Little Drummer Boy” is another old one and favorite of mine that also does this, while the Veggie Tales “The Toy That Saved Christmas” is the highlight of the new generation. Many so-called Christmas specials, however, purport to be about finding the true meaning of Christmas, but where is the Christ in “Rudolph the Red-nosed Reindeer,” “How the Grinch Stole Christmas,” “It’s a Wonderful Life” or “A Christmas Story”? Watch these and most other shows and you’ll get the message that you can be what you want to be and you should do kind things for others, and that Bumbles bounce. Nice shows and nice sentiments all, but while Jesus would exhort us to be “nice” it isn’t why he came. Don’t forget that “for unto you is born this day in the city of Bethlehem a Savior, who is Christ the Lord.”

Enjoy the shows with your family, but look for ways to highlight fundamental Christian concepts within the programs, even if these messages appear unintentional. Since everything will ultimately prove the word of God true, teachable moments are everywhere if we are alert to them. The classic movie “Miracle on 34th Street,” for example, really focuses on the importance of faith, at one point virtually reciting Hebrews 11:1 and 11:5-6. Don’t miss the opportunity to call this to your children’s’ attention. I once sat open-mouthed (but not slack-jawed) watching the SpongeBob Squarepants Christmas program for the first time. The story is that SpongeBob has never heard of Santa Claus until his friend Sandy fills him in. SpongeBob get so excited that he stands on a street corner proclaiming the good news to everyone (no one else has heard of Santa either) about how kind Santa is and about all the gifts he will bring. Soon, everyone is shouting, “We love Santa!” I turned to my daughter and said, “SpongeBob is an evangelist!”

Of course, SpongeBob is focusing on all the benefits that Santa brings, which is also a failing of modern evangelism. People are exhorted to “try” Jesus for all the blessings that will be added to their lives but if these don’t show up right away (or don’t show up in the way people expect) they get disillusioned, even bitter. This, too, happens in the SpongeBob Christmas show. We lose sight of the fact that the first benefit of the salvation we receive from believing in Christ is not in getting what we deserve, but in avoiding what we deserve.

A good story for illustrating this concept can be Charles Dickens’ “A Christmas Carol.” You may think you know the story of Ebenezer (there’s a Biblical name) Scrooge, but look at it as a parable. Scrooge is greedy and cruel and oblivious to his iniquity. He doesn’t heed warnings to change, but because of another’s desire for him to avoid his fate, he is visited by spirits that convince and convict him of his sins and show him what is in store for him. In horror he repents and asks for forgiveness, vowing to change. He’s not concerned about the benefits of a new way of life; he just wants to escape the fruit of the old way. Waking the next morning and realizing his opportunity he says “Thank you (Holy Spirit) Spirits!” and is ever after known as “a man who kept Christmas (Jesus) in his heart.” (By the way, I happen to think the George C. Scott “Christmas Carol” is the best, but I’ll always have a soft spot for Mr. Magoo as well).

I’m sure there are many more examples in Christmas programs that I’ve left out but that have occurred to you. I’d love to hear what message or blessing you and your family get out of different Christmas shows, so feel free to leave a comment. Just don’t shoot your eye out!

Merry Christmas, my friends, and to your families!

Update:

Rob's touching tribute to Linus's speech about the true meaning of Christmas is posted over on The Llama Butchers (originally posted last Christmas).

Friday, November 25, 2005

Friday Fundamentals in Film: The Tin Star
The Tin Star is another western and my personal favorite from this genre. I selected it for this series because, while it has similar themes of honor and duty as in High Noon, it adds an element of what the world today calls "mentoring" but I call "discipleship".

The story involves a wizened and jaded bounty hunter, Morgan (Morg) Hickman, played by Henry Fonda, who rides into town with his latest "dead or alive" target, who is distinctly in the former category. While Morg would just as soon get paid and get out of town, he has to wait around a few days while the local bank gets confirmation in order to release the money. Morg's claim naturally brings him into contact with the town sheriff, Ben Owens (Anthony Perkins), a young and idealistic man filling in as a temporary replacement for his recently murdered predecessor. Ben is eager to be a force for law and order in the town (despite his girlfriend's objections) and tries to make up for what he lacks in experience with bravado and passion. He finds Morg's work disgusting and doesn't approve of killing, even if it's a bad guy.

Nevertheless, the two hit it off as Morg, a former sheriff, sees something of his less jaded self in Ben, while Ben (after an unexpected demonstration in the streets) admires Morg's experience and ability to size up a situation and react appropriately. When Ben learns Morg used to be a sheriff he asks him for help in learning how to do the job effectively and stay alive. Morg reluctantly agrees since he has to hang around for a few days anyway and he sees that young Ben has a lot to learn.

Of course, it turns out to be a pretty eventful few days as Ben has to deal both with a rabble-rousing, power-hungry bigot who wants the sheriff's job for himself, as well as the murder of a much-beloved citizen and a lynch-mob that wants to exact its own justice. Throughout the process Ben learns that a fast brain is more important than a fast gun and Morg learns simply that some things are just more important, period. Along with that you see an interesting illustration of bullies and mob dynamics. There's also the pusillanimous townspeople with high-minded notions of justice but ultimately wanting peace at any price (which inadvertently became a sub-theme in this series as it appears in this movie, in High Noon and in a later movie we'll look at as well).

While the action and drama centers around Morg and Ben, the kindly Doc McCord (John McIntyre) also sets an example of service and selflessness that is easily overlooked by the viewer, perhaps because he's an "old" guy. When I discussed the movie with the class I went around the room and asked each lad who he thought the best man in the movie was. Some said Morg, some said Ben; none said Doc McCord so we had a fruitful discussion about his character traits as well. Here's the rest of the outline the boys and I went through:

Key Points:
The importance of discipleship: being willing to receive it, and being willing to provide it.

The importance of will in separating a leader from a follower.

The importance of character (and vision/understanding of a cause or ideal beyond yourself) in separating a leader for good from a leader for evil.

The Rule of Law is worth defending, even at great personal cost.

Some Questions to Answer:

  1. Why did Ben want to be Sheriff? Can you come up with four words that describe his character?
  2. Why did Bogardes want to be Sheriff? What words describe his character? (Does he remind you of anybody?)
  3. Why did the crowd want to follow him?
  4. What is the most important “tool” a Sheriff needs to know how to use?
  5. Why was Bogardes almost able to get the drop on Ben the first time?
  6. Why was it important that the McGaffy brothers get a fair trial even though it was obvious they were guilty?
  7. Why wouldn’t Morg accept the badge at first? Why did he put it on later?
  8. Were Morg's reasons for turning his back on being a sheriff justified?

Points to Ponder:
Compare and contrast Morg and Ben with Will Kane (High Noon).

  1. What role could faith have played in Morg’s life?
  2. Why does a mob behave the way it does?
  3. What would you do?
  4. Who was the best man in the movie?

Thursday, November 24, 2005

I am thankful for: what God has shown me
It's Thanksgiving week and I'm busy finishing up projects at home and work before jumping in the car with the wife and kids and heading for the family gathering a good ten hours away.

As I reflect on the things I'm thankful for, I've got something new to add to my list this year: those of you who have made it a point to visit here regularly.

Yes, I write this blog to amuse and test myself, buy I appreciate your interest and try to picture you in my mind on those days when it would be easier not to post. I want to have something (hopefully) interesting here each time you look in. As such, I don't want to let this blog "go dark" in the coming week while I'm traveling and enjoying my family, so I've collected a few past posts that you may or may not have seen that illustrate the things I'm thankful for, and scheduled them to appear over the next few days for any of you who take the time from your own obligations and celebrations to stop by.

Each day will have a different them. Today's theme: I am thankful for what God has shown me.

Duty is ours. Results are God's

Love — and the difference between being a friend and being friendly


Oh Theocracy!

Wednesday, November 23, 2005

I am thankful for: health
It's Thanksgiving week and I'm busy finishing up projects at home and work before jumping in the car with the wife and kids and heading for the family gathering a good ten hours away.

As I reflect on the things I'm thankful for, I've got something new to add to my list this year: those of you who have made it a point to visit here regularly.

Yes, I write this blog to amuse and test myself, buy I appreciate your interest and try to picture you in my mind on those days when it would be easier not to post. I want to have something (hopefully) interesting here each time you look in. As such, I don't want to let this blog "go dark" in the coming week while I'm traveling and enjoying my family, so I've collected a few past posts that you may or may not have seen that illustrate the things I'm thankful for, and scheduled them to appear over the next few days for any of you who take the time from your own obligations and celebrations to stop by.

Each day will have a different them. Today's theme: I am thankful for health.

Night in the Emergency Room

Of Migraines and the Fear of Man

Tuesday, November 22, 2005

I'm thankful for: family
It's Thanksgiving week and I'm busy finishing up projects at home and work before jumping in the car with the wife and kids and heading for the family gathering a good ten hours away.

As I reflect on the things I'm thankful for, I've got something new to add to my list this year: those of you who have made it a point to visit here regularly.

Yes, I write this blog to amuse and test myself, buy I appreciate your interest and try to picture you in my mind on those days when it would be easier not to post. I want to have something (hopefully) interesting here each time you look in. As such, I don't want to let this blog "go dark" in the coming week while I'm traveling and enjoying my family, so I've collected a few past posts that you may or may not have seen that illustrate the things I'm thankful for, and scheduled them to appear over the next few days for any of you who take the time from your own obligations and celebrations to stop by.

Each day will have a different them. Today's theme: I am thankful for family.

Dad to the Bone

My Head in Her Hands, and a Wistful Mr. Henri Looks Back

The Knowing

Monday, November 21, 2005

And lightning flies out of ...
Thanks for stopping by. It's been a crazy day and the night is going to be chock-full too as I try to finish some other projects before making the holiday migration. Here's a place-holder for now that I picked up over at Bogus Gold and saved for just such a contingency: What Action Hero Would You Be?

No super powers for me or expensive, high-tech gadgets; just steely will, a desire not to be messed with, and the ability to wear a kilt with elan.


You scored as William Wallace. The great Scottish warrior William Wallace led his people against their English oppressors in a campaign that won independence for Scotland and immortalized him in the hearts of his countrymen. With his warrior's heart, tactician's mind, and poet's soul, Wallace was a brilliant leader. He just wanted to live a simple life on his farm, but he gave it up to help his country in its time of need.

What Action Hero Would You Be? v.2.0

Thursday, November 17, 2005

Friday Fundamentals in Film: Zulu


The second movie in the series for the boys was the classic "Zulu", starring a very slender Michael Caine in, I think, his first movie. It's based on the true story of barely 100 British soldier's standing alone against some 10,000 Zulu warriors in the battle of Roark's Drift the day after a much larger British force had been wiped out by the same Zulu army.

I selected this movie for the boys not only because it is an example of courage in the face of great odds, but because it shows the value of discipline as preparation for unseen and unknown challenges in the future.

While there are many real life stories of heroes rising to the occasion on a moment's notice, many times this is possible because the "hero" has spent considerable time learning to master his/her fear and will. In this movie both sides show a tremendous amount of discipline under great stress and in the face of carnage. Additionally this is an interesting examination of the way prejudice and disrespect is reflected not only between races, but even within the same race and society.

Here are the key points I wanted the young men to get out of this movie and ensuing discussion:
Courage and discipline in the face of extreme odds can carry the day.

The power of words to both encourage and discourage.

The importance of training and discipline, combined with character and courage, in making it possible to rise to an occasion when called upon.

Overcoming differences in order to work together for success.

Courage and tenacity will win the respect of your enemy.

Complaining when you find yourself in a tough situation isn't going to help you resolve that situation.

The questions:
  1. Was Rev. Witt’s use of scripture appropriate? Why or why not?
  2. How did each army demonstrate discipline?
  3. How many forms of prejudice were demonstrated in the movie?
  4. Why did Lt. Bromhead say at one point that he wished he “were not an officer and a gentleman?”
  5. What was the nature of the relationship between Sgt. Maxfield (the sick man in the infirmary) and Private Hook? Why did each behave as he did?
  6. The way Color Sergeant Bourne conducted himself hardly changed regardless of what was happening around him. Why do you think he was so unflappable?

Great Quotes:
Chard: “Hold our ground? What military genius came up with that? Someone’s son and heir who got his commission before he could shave?”
Bromhead: “I rather expect he’s no one’s son and heir now.”

Bromhead: “When you assume command, Old Boy, you’re on your own.”

Soldier: “Why us?”
Color Sergeant Vaughn: “Because we’re here lad. No one else. Just us.”
Crime in “the city”
Earlier I described the places I've lived in my life, including a few years when my family was in St. Paul. It was during the Coleman era, and things were pretty cool. Our neighborhood there was pretty quiet, but we didn't take things for granted. Allow me to describe a couple of the wild times we experienced in the big city.

A couple of months after we moved in I went down to West St. Paul one for a meeting with some guys I knew. It was a bitterly cold, snowy, slushy February night and my wife, then 8 1/2 months pregnant with our second child, stayed home to read and to put the oldest child to bed. About halfway through my meeting the waitress at the restaurant I was at came and said I had a phone call (we were poor and didn’t have a cell phone then). The guys and I all said, “uh-oh,” thinking that my wife might be in labor.

It was my wife on the phone, all right, but she needed to tell me that she thought she had heard someone kick our back door. Brave soul that she is, she had gone through the house, double-checked the locks and looked out the windows but hadn’t seen any footprints in the fresh now. She had just gotten through telling me that everything was okay but that she’d appreciate it if I didn’t dawdle in coming home, when suddenly there was another loud noise from the back door. “There it is again!” she said. “I’m calling 911!” and she hung up.

I hustled back to the table and gave a quick description of what was going on while I yanked my coat on, and then passed out orders. “Larry, follow me. Bryan, you call 911 just in case my wife’s call didn’t get completed. You other guys pray!”

It was normally a 10-minute drive from where I was to our house, but I made it in 8 despite the nasty weather, hitting my driveway in a power slide Tom Cruise would have been proud of. A police cruiser was already there and every light in and around the house was on, but I couldn’t see an officer. Not knowing if some miscreant might still make a break for it I grabbed the only weapon I had in the car as I approached the house: a long-handled ice scraper (hey, it had some pointy corners on it, and a nasty edge!). Everything was under control, however, and the policeman had already been through the house and around it without finding anything or seeing footprints. He stayed a few minutes more and after he left my wife and I and Larry, who had indeed followed me, sat around the kitchen table while my wife recovered from a delayed case of the shakes.

She’d kept her wits about her so far, even pondering where best to position herself to protect our sleeping daughter and if our cat would be a good weapon if she threw it at an intruder’s face, but now that the adrenaline was seeping away she had to regather herself. The three of us talked about how weird the situation was, but we couldn’t figure out what caused the noises. Finally Larry got up to leave and walked to the back door. He opened the inside door. He reached for the storm door.

“Uh-oh,” he said. “I know what happened.”

We went over to the door and we could see that the hydraulic arm that closed the storm door was hanging loosely from the frame. For some reason, perhaps the intense cold, one of the bolts holding the front portion of the arm to the storm door had given way; that was probably the first noise my wife had heard. Shortly thereafter the second bolt had given way, causing the arm to break free and give the wooden door a good thump. Crisis over, I returned my ice scraper to the car while laughing at the idea of a home-defense cat.

A year or two later on a summer Sunday morning about 4:00 a.m. we were awakened by the alarm from our neighbor’s garage, the sound of feet pounding down his driveway outside our bedroom window and the chirp of tires and a roaring engine in a get-away. Our house had a detached garage and faced so that we couldn’t tell from the house whether or not the overhead garage door was closed. There were a few times when this chore was overlooked.

With crimes afoot in the early morning hours I couldn’t remember if I had checked on the door the night before. Not wanting to wait to find out if anyone had gotten into the garage I got out of bed, pulled on some jeans and grabbed my new home defense system - a bright red, 28-ounce baseball bat with a Dairy Queen logo on it that I’d gotten when working for the Twins. The coast was probably clear, but why take a chance?

I alertly made my way across the backyard to the garage and gently turned the handle on the side door. Carp! It was unlocked! I paused. If someone had gotten into the garage, and if the big door was closed, I might soon be facing a young, hyper interloper. I decided I’d swing the door open with my left hand and in the same motion reach up and push the button to open the overhead if necessary, giving anyone inside a clear path to escape that didn’t necessarily have to run through me. Just in case, the red bat was cocked in my right hand.

There was nobody there.

Later in the morning I encountered my neighbor. “A little excitement this morning, huh?” I said.

“Yeah,” he said. “The really weird thing is I looked out my window and I saw someone who was clearly up to no good in your backyard and, I swear, he was holding what looked like a red baseball bat!”

I gave him my best Clint Eastwood squint, and made some comment about him hiding in his bed, adding, “a man’s got to know his limitations.”

Now, I’m not going to say how our home security has evolved in the time since then, but if anyone’s thinking of testing our defenses all I can advise is that you be ready for anything, including being rendered helpless by uncontrollable laughter.
Where I live
Shot in the Dark, Spitbull, the Nihilist in Golf Pants, among others, have been debating the merits of living in the city vs. living in the ‘burbs. As someone who’s lived in the country, lived in the suburbs, lived inside the city limits of both Minneapolis and St. Paul, and who currently lives in an inner-ring suburb, I have to say I like it where I am now.

When I was in high school the small-town life didn’t offer me a lot: there wasn’t much to do, everyone seemed to know your business, and I was related to just about everyone in town in some way (not bad in terms of having a built-in social network; on the other hand, family reunions aren’t a great place for meeting women). I later bounced around in a few rental places in South Minneapolis chosen more for convenience and affordability than anything else. They were close to my job and had other conveniences ideal for a single guy: the last apartment I rented had a White Castle across the street, a drive-through ATM behind it, a grocery store kitty-corner from it and a great little pizza place with live bluegrass music just a few blocks away. The neighborhood definitely lacked cachet, however, and in most of my memories of these days the weather is always gray.

When I bought my first home I had to venture out to where the pavement ended (or so it seemed) to find a place I could afford. Coon Rapids was quiet and nowhere near as built up then as it is now, which made it a lot like living in my old home town except no one had gunracks in their pickup trucks in Coon Rapids. It took awhile to get anywhere from there, and it was always slightly embarrassing to tell people where I lived.

Later I sold that place and my wife and I and our budding family moved into a cozy rambler near Wheelock Parkway in Norm Coleman’s St. Paul. It was a tidy neighborhood of older but well-maintained homes but one thing that tended to drive me crazy was that it seemed as if there was some kind of siren – police, fire, ambulance – every fifteen minutes. City life was interesting (see post above) but we eventually moved to South St. Paul to be closer to church and the private school where we had enrolled the girls.

I like South St. Paul. It's really a small town right next to a big city. We have our own "downtown", the only franchise in the vicinity is Dairy Queen, and it takes all of 10 minutes to go from one side of town to the other. Our neighborhood is quiet, the people help each other out and the streets are laid out in a quirky enough way that it pays to be a "local". Aside from having to maintain constant vigilance lest the school board sneak another levy in during an off-year election the city politics, while DFL-dominated, are mostly harmless. And if you've just got to have a Big Mac or other taste of civilization and convenience, Robert Street is just a mile away. Life is good!
Know your MOBsters
Few know the Minnesota Organization of Bloggers as well as Douglas Bass, who has blogged as Belief Seeking Understanding, as Apprehension and currently as Crossword Bebop.

He's now taken the logical step and created a MOB aggregator the top 25 MOB blogs as measured by TTLB and created an aggregator that shows the three most recent posts of each. It's a great way to go around the MOB to quickly see what people are writing about. I know it's really going to help me visit many deserving blogs that I don't always get to during the normal course of things.

Thanks, Douglas!

Wednesday, November 16, 2005

More than just Cheeseheads...
Apparently, Cheeseheads are only the beginning in Packerland. There's also cheese — er, well, here's a picture:



Oh.My.Gouda. No word on whether or not these are available in different varieties such as Sharp Cheddar or Sexy Swiss. Or if there are plans to hook-up with this product:



You can order cheese-bras here. Cheese balls, anyone?
Food for thought
Night daughter Tiger Lilly has a post called "Can You Put God in a Box?" over on the MAWB Squad today about Operation Christmas Child and her approach to filling shoeboxes with gifts for children in crisis areas. Among other things she writes that she likes doing stuff with charity organizations.

I can easily vouch for that sentiment because I remember a time when she was six years old. It was about this time of year and she was flipping through the newspaper looking for the comics when she came across a large ad from the Union Gospel Mission in St. Paul. The ad featured a picture of a ragged looking, bearded man with a full plate of food and a headline that said for $1.79 you could buy someone a full Thanksgiving dinner. She studied that for awhile and then asked if you could really get all that food for that amount of money. I told her it was so. A dawning realization came over her, and she said, "Hey, I've got $1.79 - I could buy someone dinner!" To prove it she went upstairs and brought down her stash, pulling out a crumpled bill and counting out 79 cents.

My heart in my throat, I tested her by asked whether she was sure she didn't want to save her money to buy something else. It was such a rush then to see her respond so naturally and spontaneously that I now can't remember her response word for word, but it was along the lines that no, she'd rather see somebody get something to eat for Thanksgiving. So a little while later she crammed the money in her pocket and I took her down to the mission where she could give it directly to a friend of our family who was serving as a chaplain there. She brought out her cash, he thanked her and gave her a receipt. I wrote out a check worth a few more dinners and we floated home.

Her $1.79 warmed more than one heart that year.
Monty Policy and the Holy Wail


Leave it to Chief over at Freedom Dogs to sniff out the strong resemblence between would-be female suicide bomber Sajida Mubarak Atrous al-Rishawi and former Monty Python drag diva Terry Jones.

Chief asked if the two might have been separated at birth, especially given the title of Jones’s latest book, “Terry Jones's War on the War on Terror”, and left either a challenge or invitation for me (another Pythonophile) to offer my take.

It’s not surprising that Jones has written a book (several, actually) since he contributed to the troupe largely through writing and directing and took smaller but significant speaking roles (frequently in drag as one of the pepperpot housewives) when it came to performance. His characters aren’t as readily remembered as some of those created by John Cleese, Eric Idle, Michael Palin or Graham Chapman, but he had some good parts and good lines. As such, I think it’s best to review his book using some of his own words. Imagine the following promotional blurbs on the book jacket (like most of those who offer these mini-reviews in real life, I don’t feel as if I necessarily have to read the book itself; I mean, it’s not like I'm trying to summarize Proust or something).

As the Mom in the “Dead Bishop on the Landing sketch”: “Liberal rubbish! Whaddaya want with yer jugged fish?” (Alternatively, “Well, it’s got some rat in it.”)

As the peasant woman in “The Holy Grail”: “There’s some lovely filth over here!”

As Mr. Spreaders in the “Argument Clinic” sketch: “I’m sorry, it’s ‘being hit on the head lessons’ in here.”

As Mr. Creosote in “The Meaning of Life”: “BLEAUAARGHH!”


Tuesday, November 15, 2005

Lost Weekend in Madison, 1929
My grandfather's birthday is today; he would have been 91. In his life he was a farmer, a teacher, a fireman on a steam locomotive, a salesman, a trouble-shooter, a successful businessman and an eternally curious observer of life and the human condition. He was also a writer and storyteller from a young age. Blessed with an eye for detail, a keen memory and the patience to write it all down in longhand, he wrote mainly for his own interest. While he rarely submitted anything to be published, we grew up with his stories of the people he had met and known in his life.

One story we heard often, either in its entirety or in bits, had to do with a true adventure of one of his best friends. Eventually he got the story down on paper. In honor of his birthday and because the story takes place at this time of year and in town not that far from here, I'm posting it. All of the people involved are long gone, as are many who ever heard it told. The written version has never, as far as I know, appeared outside of our family. It is something that I will always cherish, though I must warn those of you want to continue that it is not a story for those with a faint heart or weak stomach.


Monday, November 14, 2005

Fighting through
I took in a little boxing action Saturday afternoon at Central High School as I watched a young man from our church make his boxing debut. I’m pretty certain it wasn’t his first fight, though; just the first one with a referee and a bell and people watching who wished him well.

I’ve known the kid since he joined the family of some friends of ours as a foster child when he was little and was later adopted. I’ve encountered him regularly at church and through some of his schooling and from when his father would bring him to our men’s ministry functions. More recently he’s been part of the youth group my wife and I lead. I think he loves his family and wants to do right and do well, but he’s also been impulsive, oppositional and stubborn since the beginning and ready for a scrap, including times — such as a few years ago when I insisted upon a little one-on-one sit down with him — when I’m pretty sure he’d even have liked to take a couple of pokes at me. In a way, however, you almost couldn’t help but admire his will and the way he'd bow his neck and resist and endure any correction, no matter how long it lasted. You could tell there was something mighty inside that would make a tremendous foundation if it could ever be channeled in the right direction.

He’s 17 now, and several months ago he met up with former pro boxer Sankara Frazier and his Circle of Discipline gym. Frazier’s a hard-nosed guy determined to help kids use boxing to get their act together physically, emotionally and, in particular, spiritually through discipline, focus and hard work. Since then it has been as if a light has gone on in this young man’s head, a light so bright you can see it in his face. It’s as if all the instruction, correction and encouragement he’s received over the years have come together now that he can see a practical application. Since he’s been working with Frazier he’s not nearly as volatile, and his natural charm and wit have come to the fore.

Last Wednesday he was telling me about his upcoming bout and I could tell he was excited. I may be reading too much into it, but I think he was happy not just for the chance to compete but also because he realizes now that people are interested in seeing him do well. I told him I was going to come to the fight, but that he had to be sure to make the fight last long enough to make it worth my trip.

So what does he do? About a minute into the first round and after exchanging a few flurries of punches with his opponent he gets a left jab in, followed by a right hand that knocks the other guy to his knees in a corner. The referee stood the other kid up, wiped his gloves and gave him a standing eight count. When the kid didn’t raise his gloves by the end of the count the ref called the fight and our young boxer and most of his sizable cheering section left our feet. As he moved through the group afterwards we hooked hands and the first thing he did was to laugh and say, “I know, you told me to make it last longer but he just kept leaving it open so I just kept feeding him my right hand!”

“It’s alright – you did well,” I said. “Congratulations!”

It may be just one round, but I think the young man may have finally heard the bell.

Thursday, November 10, 2005

Friday Fundamentals in Film: High Noon


It seems that most of the television and movies kids are exposed to today don't offer much in the way of constructive lessons or examples of how to live your life, especially for young men. Well, just about everything is an example I guess, but good ones are few and far between. There are some movies, new and old, that do offer inspiring examples and over the next few Fridays I'd like to share some of these with you, along with the story of how they were incorporated into a group of junior high and high school aged boys. The first movie in this series is the Gary Cooper classic, High Noon, but before I get into that allow me to offer a little background.

A couple of years ago my oldest daughter was still in private school and I found myself frequently in the company of the boys in her classes. Listening to their conversation and the things that were interesting to them I could tell that the images of manhood they were getting from their entertainment were rather limited: essentially either Homer Simpson or pro wrestlers, and this was showing up in their behavior.

Now this is a complex age for boys already, and these images they were absorbing weren't helpful. I wanted better for their lives, especially since they were around my daughter, so I tried to think of a way both entertaining and challenging to offer examples to model character in concentrated doses. Almost immediately a plan developed nearly fully formed in my mind. I worked it out with the school and my employer so that I could show a series of movies (with discussion time after each) to the boys on Friday afternoons during the spring semester as part of an elective class where the boys would be graded. Naturally, an afternoon of watching movies was appealing to the lads, but there was a catch. I divided them into two teams, gave each boy a scorecard I designed and announced special rules, only for them.

In order to view that week's movie, each boy would have to earn a set number of points on his scorecard. The card detailed the point values of various acts of service and courtesy they could earn. There was also a list of things with point values that would subtract from their totals. If a young man hadn't earned the minimum number of points by class time, he'd have to spend the afternoon in a study hall or in classes with the girls. Not only that, his behavior also affected his team which not only got credit for all points earned by its members, but also for having a full complement present during class time. At the end of the semester the highest scoring team would be treated to a Famous Dave's feast. In the coming weeks I'll describe how this experiment played out, along with providing the questions and “thinking points” I brought up with the guys for each movie. If you're already familiar with these movies then try the questions out yourself. If there are important issues you think I've missed in any of the films then feel free to leave your input in a comment. As with the young men, I hope you'll find this exercise entertaining and useful.

Boys are smelly
That's what it says on a tee-shirt long coveted by my wife and oldest daughter. I'm guessing that it may also be favored by Claude Peck and Rick Nelson, the writers behind the Withering Glance column, the StarTribune's paean to metrosexuality and snarky boy-talk on fashion and grooming. In a recent column they took a slap not only at men who wear too much cologne, but also at those whose selected scents are passe.

Personally, I didn't know that men's fragrances fell in and out of style like the widths of lapels and ties, but I guess it's not that surprising. You really can't promote something as being "in" this year unless there's a corresponding something that's "out" and I probably would have realized this if I thought as much about cologne as I do, say, about the air pressure in my tires. I guess I better not dust-off those old bottle of Grey Flannel or Devon Country if I don't want to get sneered out of Bellanotte (or I could just avoid Bellanotte).

I blame my lack of sophistication on my upbringing. I didn't have much exposure to splash-on manly scents beyond Old Spice, Avon's Wild Country (in a cool-looking duck-shaped bottle) or some good old Aqua Velva. (I do remember thinking at one time back then that it would be cool to have some Hai Karate aftershave because I thought, based on the commercials, that it automatically gave you martial arts powers).

Apparently these days a guy has to be sensitive to the dictates of the fashionistas and the nuances of sandalwood undertones. Such complexity outside of my experience makes me conservative and unwilling to take chances. Outside of a good soap and a strong deodorant, the only time I stick my neck out is when I see my wife coming at me with one of those scent samplers torn from a magazine. I try to avoid having my presence be offensive, but other than that what I smell like isn't that important to me.

I know, I'm missing the point. I'm not supposed to wear cologne because I like it, but because other people (presumably women) do. I hang out with guys a lot and I'm sure I've smelled cologne or aftershave occasionally, but it's never made a memorable impression on me. There must be something about the way a woman's olfactory receptors are wired to her receptiveness - or at least that's the story we guys are buying. If you tell us that rolling in fish guts will have women curling up in our laps like the family cat then we'll do it (yeah, there are guys who'd roll in fish guts anyway, but you get my point). Furthermore, shouldn't a woman be attracted by a scent that communicates the guy is an earnest, hard-working fellow and a good provider, something like an eau-de-livelongday scent? Instead, why do so many men's colognes have all the bad boy subtlety of a wife-beater tee-shirt and steel-toed cowboy boots?

And here's another thing: supposedly, guys wear scents that are scientifically proven (we like that science business) to attract women. But why do women wear perfume? Most of the flowery, fruity things I smell don't do much as far as piquing my interest. There was a time, though, in the 80s when Obsession ruled the world that I'd get nauseous when I smelled it because it actually reminded me of Shelltox, an aerosol insecticide we used when I was growing up to kill wasps in our garage. If the flowery, fruity stuff isn't for attracting guys then does that mean women wear perfume for other women? And if that's the case, shouldn't guys splash on the flowery, fruity when they're trying to attract women - even if it smells worse to us than fish guts?

Again, I'm in over my head on this subject, so I'd like to know from other guys what colognes, if any, you wear and why, along with any successes or spectacular disasters you've experienced as a result. Similarly, ladies, what do you like to smell on a man, and why? And just so it's not one-sided, I'll share this:

The scent that really gets my attention and makes my heart pound is pork cutlets and sauerkraut. Ohhh, baby!
Bomb threat at church interrupts gay marriage amendment conference
A multi-denominational conference of clergy in favor of an amendment to the Minnesota constitution banning gay marriage was interrupted this morning by a bomb threat (story here). The conference is being held at Grace Church in Eden Prarie, and is described in this article.

A bomb threat (but no bomb) is a pretty mild response compared to what happened at this recent conference in Boston.

Wednesday, November 9, 2005

Democrats, nation, criticize the president's handling of the war
The following appeared yesterday in Garrison Keillor’s The Writer’s Almanac newsletter. Does it sound familiar to you?

It was on this day in 1864 that Abraham Lincoln was elected to his second term as President of the United States, an election that helped ensure the preservation of the Union. It was one of the only times in history that an election was held by a nation in the middle of a civil war.

Lincoln had a lot of reasons to worry the election might not go his way. The summer before the election, most Americans were weary of war, and calls to end the conflict were becoming louder and louder. Then, at the beginning of July, 1864, Lincoln was confronted with the embarrassment of a Confederate battalion trying to invade and capture Washington D.C. itself. The Confederates were driven off but not captured, and everyone who knew Lincoln at the time said he was in a terrible mood for the rest of the month.

In August, Lincoln announced that he would only negotiate peace with the Southern states if they reintegrated with the Union and if they abandoned slavery. This was the most radical position he’d taken on slavery yet, and it was so controversial that he began to lose support among his few allies in the Democratic Party, as well as members of his own Republican Party. There was talk that the Republican Party might try to nominate someone else. Lincoln worried that he’d made a terrible mistake, and so he didn’t say anything else about slavery for the rest of the campaign.

The war continued to go badly. On July 30, 4000 Union soldiers were killed in a disastrous attempt to invade Petersburg, Virginia. The army needed 500,000 more soldiers, Lincoln would probably have to call for another draft, and the war debt was becoming unsustainable. Even moderate Republicans began to criticize the president’s policies. On August 23, Lincoln wrote a memorandum to his cabinet that said, “This morning, and for some days past, it seems exceedingly probable that this Administration will not be re-elected.”

The Democratic Party held their nominating convention in the last days of August, and they chose to run on a platform of ending hostilities with the Confederate States. This turned out to be a huge mistake when, on September 4th, General Sherman announced that his army had captured Atlanta. At the same time, Rear Admiral David G. Farragut announced that he had captured Mobile, Alabama, the last major Gulf port in Confederate hands.

Suddenly, the Democratic Party looked like the party of surrender when the Union was on the verge of winning the war. In the end, Lincoln carried every state except New Jersey, Delaware, and Kentucky.

Tuesday, November 8, 2005

(Why) Is Paris Burning?
I've been following the rioting in France rather casually. Yesterday I played a little game where I read several MSM stories on the subject and counted how many paragraphs into each article you had to read before the word “Muslim” or “Islam” or a similar variant was mentioned (note: the average was 5-6 paragraphs in). I saw a different and interesting take last night, however, on Jay Reding's Single Malt Pundit blog.

Jay links a post by Gregory Djerjian that describes the riots not as a rising of Arab militancy but the predictable and crashing fall of the Socialist model and attempts of class equality. After citing a very interesting passage in Djerjian's post, Jay says:

While it’s certain that radical Muslims are taking advantage of this situation, it wasn’t radical Islam that started it - it was the failure of the French social model that provided a perfect breeding ground for this terrorism. A state with an unemployment rate in the double digits cannot expect to have a stable and prosperous society. A society in which enterprise is systematically stifled by paternalistic regulations cannot hope to keep their level of unemployment down. A state with a low birth rate cannot sustain its economic base, but importing foreign labor and not assimilating them into society creates tensions. Everything about the current French societal model has led to this breakdown, and after 11 days the government is still looking powerless and confused.

For all the Gallic moaning about the terrors of the “Anglo-Saxon” model, their supposedly more “humanistic” French model has produced vast concrete ghettoes with levels of unemployment that makes the American inner city look positively prosperous in comparison. The state socialist model is failing in France, it’s failing in Germany, and the most prosperous parts of Europe are that way precisely because they’re either too small to experience the shocks of their larger siblings, or they’ve abandoned state socialism for free market reform.

For myself, I've wondered about how well coordinated the riots appear to be and if the escalation in violence by the rioters might not be an effort to provoke a violent response from the French government that can be leveraged into an even greater rallying point. I've also wondered if the French reluctance to impose even a curfew might not be driven by memories of the 1961 Paris massacre where largely peaceful protests by Algerians against curfews led to as many as 200 people being killed by police (and then complicitly hushed up for 30-odd years).

There are lessons to be learned from all of this, I'm sure, and Jay Reding's and Djerjian's takes should be part of the curricula.
What Calvin & Hobbes character are you?
As Calvin would say, "I understand my tests are popular reading in the teachers' lounge."


What Calvin & Hobbes character are you?
created with QuizFarm.com

You scored as Calvin. You are Calvin! You are an obnoxious little six-year-old who knows way too much to be getting Fs in school. You know how to have the best time playing, and can annoy adults to no end.


Monday, November 7, 2005

My first Meme ever!
I saw this on the EckerNet (who got it from Ka