"The first family of Minnesota Blogging" - Mitch Berg, Shot in the Dark

Illuminating fun, faith,
family and foolishness.

“Marxism is the opium of the intellectuals.”

- Edmund Wilson

Thursday, November 30, 2006

Ooops, she did it again

Britney forgets panties, may lose shirt.

Gee, now I've got this line running over and over in my head. No, it's not a song lyric.

"As a ring of gold in a swine's snout,
So is a lovely woman who lacks discretion."
Prov. 11:22 (NKJV)

Wednesday, November 29, 2006

All the news to rinse and spit

There was an interesting story in the Minneapolis StarTribune yesterday about an elderly man who heard someone breaking into his home and, when confronted in his bedroom by the intruder, shot and killed the burglar. The original story was pretty spare on details, though the police indicated that the homeowner was within his rights and was not likely to be prosecuted.

Considering that it's the Strib, however, and its well-established anitpathy toward guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens, I wasn't suprised to see in today's follow-up story that the paper, in its commitment to informing the public (as long as it can advance its own agenda, that is) solemnly informed us that the homeowner's house was dilapidated and likely to be condemned, thereby suggesting that the intruder may have mistakenly thought the house was abandoned (which, of course, makes it all right to break and enter). At least the condition of the house had some connection to the story. The article finished by reporting that the homeowner was a former teacher and school principal who had been fired 25 years ago for being "unfit to teach" due a "list of deficiencies" including having a "rigid and stiff" classroom manner and for picking on and swearing at students. He's evil!

No doubt tomorrow we'll have another story focusing on the young "victim" who will turn out to be a troubled young man just on the verge of getting his life together before his fatal misadventure, which could have been prevented if only someone had "done something."

Okay, that's the news business. When you've got a story that gets a lot of attention you naturally want to follow up and include more details to keep the readers coming back. For example, let's take one of the biggest stories of the past few days that has both a local and national following: the "flying Imams" who were cold-bloodedly persecuted for innocently scaring the bejeezus out of their fellow passengers and the flight crew:

The imams say they were removed from the Phoenix-bound flight because they were praying quietly in the concourse. They had been in Minnesota for a conference sponsored by the North American Imams Federation.

But other passengers told police and aviation security officials a different version of the incident. They said suspicious behavior of the imams led to their eviction from the flight...

...The passengers and flight crew said the imams prayed loudly before boarding; switched seating assignments to a configuration used by terrorists in previous incidents; asked for seat-belt extensions, which could be used as weapons; and shouted hostile slogans about al Qaeda and the war in Iraq.

Flight attendants said three of the six men, who did not appear to be overweight, asked for the seat-belt extensions, which include heavy metal buckles, and then threw them to the floor under their seats.

Wow, holy indignation, airline security and national attention! I can't wait for the Strib to bring us more information about the backgrounds of these now frequent flyers, or to tell us more about this important Muslim conference held in our very own Twin Cities and attended by our very own first-ever Muslim congressman-elect, Keith Ellison!

Perhaps I'm expecting too much, given the Strib seemed to have a lot of trouble getting anything other than sketchiest of details about Ellison's background such as his campus writings and long-time affiliation with Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan. Finding out more background information on these humble holy men is probably even more difficult. Unless you're Michelle Malkin, that is:

Will they mention Shahin's admitted ties to Osama bin Laden and denial of the 9/11 al Qaeda plot?

Or his connection to a Hamas-linked terror charity front?

Will they mention Mahdi Bray's terror-sympathizing statements and stances?

Or the Muslim American Society's radical embrace of sharia and faux pose as the "moderate" front for the Muslim Brotherhood? (My debate on Laura Ingraham's radio show with one of the double-talking MAS spokesmen here.)

Or will they mindlessly play along with the grievance-mongers, lazily echoing the cries of "Islamophobia" and joining in self-flagellation?

Oh well, see you in the funny papers.
Happy Birthday, C.S. Lewis
Today's the birthday of C.S. Lewis, author of The Chronicles of Narnia, Mere Christianity and numerous other books of allegorical fantasy, inspiration and Christian apologia, including my favorites, Surprised by Joy and The Screwtape Letters. In light of yesterday's post, the following quote from Lewis seems appropriate:

Much of the modern resistance to chastity comes from men’s belief that they “own” their bodies - those vast and perilous estates, pulsating with the energy that made the worlds, in which they find themselves without their consent and from which they are ejected at the pleasure of Another!

Today's Writer's Almanac has this account:

C.S. (Clive Staples) Lewis (books by this author) was born in Belfast, Ireland (1898). He said of his childhood, "I am a product ...[of] books. There were books in the study, books in the drawing-room, books in the cloak room, books in a bedroom, books piled as high as my shoulder in the attic, books of all kinds reflecting every transient stage of my parents' interests, books readable and unreadable, books suitable for a child and books most emphatically not. Nothing was forbidden me. In the seemingly endless rainy afternoons I took volume after volume from the shelves."

Lewis's parents were Anglicans and took him to church as a boy, but he found religion cold and boring. He preferred pagan mythology: Irish, Norse, and Greek myths he read in storybooks. He created an imaginary country called "Boxen" and wrote stories about it. He said, "My early stories were an attempt to combine my two chief literary pleasures — 'dressed animals' and 'knights in armour.' As a result, I wrote about chivalrous mice and rabbits who rode out in complete mail to kill not giants but cats."

He began teaching philosophy at Oxford, where he met J.R.R. Tolkien. Tolkien was a devout Christian and Lewis was an atheist, but they shared a love for mythology. They took a long walks around the Oxford grounds, debating the existence of God. Tolkien tried to persuade Lewis that the story of Jesus was a myth but that it had also actually happened.

The morning after one of those walks, Lewis went with his brother to the zoo. He said, "When we set out [for the zoo] I did not believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, and when we reached the zoo I did. Yet I had not exactly spent the journey in thought. Nor in great emotion." He became the most prominent Christian apologist in the world. He recorded a series of lectures for radio, which were broadcast in England during World War II, and many people gathered around their radios to take comfort from his ideas in the midst of bombing raids. The lectures were collected into his book Mere Christianity (1952).

But he is best remembered for the seven books in the Chronicles of Narnia, which he started publishing in 1950. Lewis decided to write for children, even though he never had any children himself and had never had any strong relationships with children. He wanted to give children what he had gotten himself from fairytales when he was a child.

C.S. Lewis said, "You can't get a cup of tea big enough or a book long enough to suit me."

Tuesday, November 28, 2006

Oh, boy
There was a story in the newspaper last week just before I left town that kept going through my mind. It was about a 16-year-old boy who was on the run from his home and from the juvenile authorities and who was upset that — for some strange reason — his girlfriend's father wouldn't let them see each other. Therefore he got a gun, went to his girlfriend's house where the father was alone, confronted the man and put the gun to his own head and threatened to shoot himself if the father wouldn't let them be together.

Boy, just when you think you're going to have a problem...

I'm thinking that if it's me I'd say something like, "Don't pull that trigger, son! You want to squeeeeze it gently or you might miss."

Okay, I probably wouldn't say that. I'd probably think it, but I wouldn't say it. Maybe. I'm generally a pretty compassionate guy, and I know that this story involves a real kid who obviously has some real problems, and I pray he gets some real help. Who knows, I may even meet him some day, though you can be pretty sure he wouldn't make it through the first interview if he had any thoughts of achieving "boyfriend" status and hadn't picked up a clue or two along the way. If someone showed up around here drinking self-pity out of a sippy cup and thinking he had a "right" to see my daughter then his self-esteem is probably the first thing that's going to be hurt. And don't tell me that that kind of attitude on his part reflects low self-esteem; it shows that it's really all about him — and believe me, that's not someone who thinks too little of himself.

What I'm looking for is a return to "honorable intentions" and the awareness that certain things have to be earned, and a willingness to do so. Would you spend years carefully maintaining your SUV, waxing and washing it, only to have some joker think he can jump in and take it off-roading with barely a "by-your-leave", let alone a promise to have it back by ten?

Of course, a SUV doesn't have much of a say in the matter, whereas a daughter might. There's no question I've got a paternalistic outlook, which is another word that has fallen into disfavor these days, but I don't apologize for it when it comes to my daughters. Look, I've changed the diapers, paid for the braces and educations, sat them on my knee and put them across it as necessary and not because they are "mine" but because I know that ultimately they're Someone else's, just as I am. They know what loves looks like, so they don't have to go around trying to find it from others. They know the value I put on them and they know my values; along the way, if I've done my job, those values have grown inside them to be better armor than any I can put around them. The high expectations aren't just mine now.

Monday, November 27, 2006

The Greatest Generations

Emily: Do any human beings ever realize life while they live it — every, every minute?

Stage Manager: No. (pause) The saints and poets, maybe they do some.


— From "Our Town," by Thornton Wilder

Fulfilling my earlier promise, I returned to the Ficke Cemetery last week to help clean up the patch of land about the size of my front yard that had become overgrown with trees and sumac from years of neglect as it drifted from the memories of the dwindling generations who still recall it. My family and I had first visited the site last July, and had barely been able to walk through the dense brush or see the headstones covered in brambles, especially the pitiably small stones marking the graves of the children.

We figured the site could endure the passing of another season, and after the autumn frost we'd be better able to get into cemetery that contains the marker for my mother's great-grandfather, George Marion West and his first and second wives. The former, Henrietta had died when she was 21, just after giving birth to my great-grandfather, William. Our plan was to cut the brush and dress the grounds as best we could, and my father had received permission to get onto the property from the farmer that now owns the land that once was the Ficke farm. He'd also contacted another man who had ancestors on those grounds and who had promised to help.

Tiger Lilly and I left for Missouri last Monday for this purpose, and our mission caused me to pay greater attention to the many cemeteries we pass on our familiar route through Iowa and into the Show-Me state. Rural cemeteries can be a mixed bag in appearance; some that we drove by were out in the open, unornamented, looking as stark and as hard as a trailer-park, or as if they were just another crop sunk into the ground with hopes for the best. In Westphalia, Missouri the cemetery is right in the heart of the town, and begins on the very edge of two-lane Highway 63 and climbs the side of a low hill, under the watchful eye of the crucified Jesus. Just north of Bloomfield, Iowa the town's cemetery covers another slope that creates a natural, sweeping amphitheater overlooking downtown, giving the impression that the dead rest where they can easily watch the goings on in the community like the scene in "Our Town." By early evening Highway 63 has turned back into a four-lane and we drive past Ashland, Missouri and another hill that bumps up against the side of the road. Looking straight up we see the silhoutte of a church and steeple, and its graveyard filled with monuments featuring tall, narrow columns and spires. Against the pink, red and yellow sunset the monuments look like so many rockets, pointed at Heaven.




Update:

To see the Google Maps aerial view of the Ficke Cemetery before we cleaned it out, go here. The cemetery is the green square in the center of the image, jutting out to the east from the other woods and located south and west of the McCallister Road.

Wednesday, November 22, 2006

Riding with the homeys (home delivery, that is)
In the city we take overnight delivery for granted. We're near airports and encoiled by dense networks of highways and paved roads and our purple, brown or yellow-liveried servants shuttle almost unnoticed amongst us, leaving our packages of must-have goods. The further you get from the big cities, however, the more those highway arteries turn into veins, moving the lifeblood of commerce through their communities. If you get far enough out, those veins even become capillaries - narrow county roads, some paved, others often covered (mostly) with gravel, some hemmed in by brush and branches. The one thing they all have in common is that there's someone waiting at the end of each one for that missing auto part, box of seeds, or froo-froo underwear.

My brother Jeff is an independent contractor for one of the big delivery services, and he services several rural communities in Missouri. He started with one truck a few years ago, and has expanded by buying two other trucks and hiring sub-contractors to drive additional routes. The newer trucks are diesel-powered Mercedes Sprinters, comparatively easy to operate and much more economical to run. My brother still drives his original one-ton Chevy truck with the big box. His route averages about 260 miles per day, the truck has more than 260,000 miles on it, making it a truck of 1,000 days. The miles aren't the only things on it; a not-so-fine layer of dust from the gravel roads coats every surface inside the cab, and long scratches groove the sides and top of the truck so densely it looks like a weaving pattern. The branches grow thick and close to the "roads" in most of the places he goes. The outside edge of the driver's seat of the truck, brushed by Jeff's cheeks 80 or 90 times a day as he slides out, is ripped and the foam padding is practically gone. As the boss, Jeff could certainly keep one of the Mercedes for himself, but this Chevy has to operate at peak efficiency if he's going to make any money, and no one is going to watch over this old truck as attentively as he will.

I meet my brother Tuesday morning at his terminal to ride along for the day. He already has his day's deliveries stacked behind the truck, organized by community and order of delivery; there's no point making a long day even longer by not being organized. Before loading up, however, we first have to replace the passenger-side mirror, which was lost to a tree on the previous run. Experienced in this task, Jeff has the new mirror in place in less than five minutes. Then we start loading; I'm hoping my extra set of hands will make the process go faster, but I feel more like I'm in Jeff's way as he hands boxes up and directs me to where they should be placed. I should have played more Tetris when I was younger. I look at the large lettering on the side of one box: "Fra - geel - ay," I say outloud. "Must be from Italy!"


Sunday, November 19, 2006

Roots, the road and ruminations

Tiger Lilly and I are setting off tomorrow morning for Missouri to get an early start on the holiday week with my folks. The Mall Diva and Reverend Mother have to work the early part of the week, but will catch up with us later. Bonita is staying with her best friend since she hasn't seen much of her lately, and there are certain complications associated with transporting a minor across state lines without the express approval of her parents.

One of the things I'm going to do while down there is help clear out the old family cemetary nearly reclaimed by nature that I wrote about back in July. I've already thrown certain tools into the trunk so that I don't drive off without them.

I've also thrown my work gloves in the car since my hands have gotten soft since the days I swung a brush-hook for, I think, $3.25 an hour. My current tools don't raise near as much sweat as the old ones; nevertheless the laptop is also making the trip. The long hours of the drive are typically good thinking time for me and I expect some things will work their way into this blog, sort of like the sumac and other shoots and saplings that have pushed through the ground out at the old Ficke farm.

Other implements of destruction in the trunk include my golf clubs. Highs for the week are forecast in the upper 50s and lower 60s, so we'll probably work in another family tradition as well. Blogging is likely to be persistent but sporadic. If I don't see you, have a happy Thanksgiving!

Thursday, November 16, 2006

Readin', Writin' and Writhing
A couple of years ago my wife served as a chaperone for a local high school prom (go here for the whole story). It was an experience that affirmed our commitment to home-education and heightened our concerns for the well-being of the coming generation:

My wife also made it home from her chaperone assignment without falling asleep, largely due to the startling effect of watching what passes for dancing these days. You see, there's this thing called "freak" dancing - because it "freaks" parents out, I think - that involves a young lady(?) placing her fundament against her escort's crotch and both of them vigorously gyrating (music optional). It appears that girls have finally found a way to get the boys out on the dance floor. My wife felt as if she should get out on the floor as well, but with a bucket of water or a garden hose. She settled for prayer instead. It kind of makes the old notion of a guy hoping for a goodnight kiss seem a bit quaint, doesn't it? I mean, after three hours of something like that with teenaged nerve endings a peck on the cheek would be - oh, shall we say - anti-climactic?

When I was in high school you could be suspended for PDAs (Public Displays of Affection) on school grounds (and yes, we thought it was silly and unfair and an example of adult narrow-mindedness). Our old high school principal would say "You know what holding hands and playing licky-face leads to — No Good!" Thirty years later perhaps we're seeing what else it leads to. I do question, however, how much "affection" this type of dancing, er, entails.

Just as I was pacing out the dimensions of an ark in my backyard, though, I saw this story in the St. Paul paper this week that suggests that rather than indifference or benign sanction, school officials are trying to clean things up.

For students at Central High School in St. Paul, this fall's homecoming was nothing like the dances of years past.

It was held in the vast space of the school's gym rather than the cafeteria, the lights were kept on, and administrators walked around shining flashlights to separate couples who got too close.

"It's really awful," said junior Laura Mohn of the new rules. "It's not right. It's not fun."

"This is not how it's supposed to be," complained junior Daniel Chahla.

Central is one of several schools in the metro area cracking down on dance behavior that some administrators say has become borderline obscene.

Inspired by popular music and videos, "grinding" or "club dancing" or "twerking" — in which girls swivel their buttocks into boys' crotches — has been around for several years. But it's become so blatant and widespread at school dances, officials say, that they're having trouble lining up adults willing to chaperone any more.

"The dancing's got so overtly sexual that we have to address it," said Tim Wald, principal at White Bear Lake High School's south campus. He described the movement as "a rhythmic grinding that … really appears to be sexual behavior."

"Now it applies to a lot of our students," Wald said. "We can't just pick out those who are misbehaving."

Glory be, the schools are actually trying to keep something out of their buildings besides the ROTC and army recruiters! Of course these moves have students gnashing their teeth, but I think that's better than having them grinding their underwear into oatmeal. Not surprisingly, students are voting with their feet (or something).

Roseville Area High principal Connie Nicholson said the homecoming dance this fall drew about a third the crowd it usually does after the school said it would "not be allowing dancing that simulates sexual activity."

Apple Valley High School has gone from nine dances a year to three — homecoming, Sadie Hawkins and prom — after students objected to new rules last year forbidding grinding. Students essentially boycotted the "smaller, sort of come-as-you-are dances," said principal Steve Degenaar. "Kids are OK with the rules as long as it's a major theme dance," he said.

On the one hand, it's less of a headache for administrators if students who aren't prepared to follow the rules stay away from dances.

On the other, dances can be a way to bond students to their school and create camaraderie. And some worry that pushing students to find their own fun on a Friday night will encourage risky behavior.

As Amy Knutson, secretary of the student council at Central, put it after watching classmates bail out on her school's homecoming dance: "I don't think it's a healthier alternative to go to clubs."

While I'm truly concerned what the longterm ramifications for our youth might be as result of school dances being cut from 9 to just 3 per year(how will we compete with other countries?), I somehow get the impression that bonding with the school isn't what the kids are interested in. Furthermore, I don't think allowing group sex in the school as a way to keep kids off the streets and out of the backseats is an effective or logical strategy. And pardon me, Ms. Knutson, but don't you have to be 21 to get into clubs in Minnesota? Get off the dance floor and get back to debate class!

Update:

Dementee over at the Koolaid Report is also on the story like a freak-dancer on a thong.

Wednesday, November 15, 2006

O.J. has found the killer at last!

Gee, hiding in the mirror all this time.

Already a pariah and pop-culture punch line, O.J. Simpson plans a book and TV interview to discuss how, hypothetically, he could have killed his ex-wife and her friend

... Denise Brown, sister of Simpson's slain ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, lashed out at publisher Judith Regan of ReganBooks for "promoting the wrongdoing of criminals" and commercializing abuse...

(Snip)

... Regan refused to say what Simpson is being paid for the book but said he came to her with the idea.

"This is an historic case, and I consider this his confession," Regan told The Associated Press...

I've made note of the date of the interview and of the book's release, but only so I can schedule a root-canal for that evening and so that I can have a reference point in my memoirs for the time when our culture finally fell into the abyss.
My own version of "The Writer's Almanac"
I enjoy the daily "Writer's Almanac" email I get from Garrison Keillor (or his staff). These always have interesting tidbits and historical notes about writers related to the current calendar date. A typical opening is "It's the birthday of...."

Well, today is the birthday of John E. West (1914-1997), my maternal grandfather, who has been referenced in this blog from time to time. Pawpaw was a gifted writer and storyteller who wrote extensively without attempting to be published (boy, does that sound familiar). This gift, if you want to call it that (actually, I think I like to "have written" more than I like to write) was passed on to me, helped by the time we spent together, the stories he told and the encouragement he gave me. I've wondered many times if he would have embraced the blogosphere had he been born 30 years later, and if so, what his stories would have been like without his experiences from the early part of the last century.

The closest I can come to finding out is to run one of his stories from his youth here. The following account took place in the mid-1920s in and around the small community of Cuba, Missouri. It's a humorous look back at the way life was then and an enlightening glimpse at the first "marketing guru" in the family. I hope you like these apples.

Apples
by John E. West


Tuesday, November 14, 2006

From dusk 'til dawn
Apparently we stand at the dawn of a new era, an era of peace and fellowship, free from the "culture of corruption," heading to a brave new world.

A brave new world, perhaps, but one with some familiar old faces. George McGovern. Dan Rather. Daniel Ortega. Hillary-Care.

"Health care is coming back," Clinton warned, adding, "It may be a bad dream for some."

Heck, even Jack Murtha's old Abscam tapes are making a comeback (wielded by members of his own party!). I wonder if Sandy Berger is in charge of returning those to the library when the Dems are done with them?

My goodness, with all this recycling, what's next: a 21% prime rate and the Misery Index?

Well, far be it from me to ignore a trend. Here's an excerpt from an oldie I posted back in the day when a certain national party had suffered another devastating political loss and was tasering itself over what went wrong and how to to repackage itself:

Not surprisingly, some of those out of power have been trying to repackage their memes in "value" oriented terms, confident (or at least hopeful) that their recent failures were merely a matter of poor communication and not a faulty philosophy. Others on that side, however, shout "Theocracy, booga booga!" as if this were a nation of vampires horrified at the sight of a crucifix. Yet their own One True Faith compels them to react to judicial nominees in the same way the Taliban greeted reliefs of Buddha.

Or perhaps these are the vampires, fleeing the dawn and being cornered in a crypt - be it the Senate Cloak Room or the faculty lounge at a University. Hissing at the rabble that have pursued them, they draw themselves up in as fierce a manner as can be mustered to demand imperiously that no one touch that window shade.

They know the day must have its turn, but if they can hold out long enough then night, too, will again have its way.

It's interesting that most of the Democrats that won election last week did so by running toward the middle, yet those aren't the voices in victory that we're hearing. Instead it's the vampires who have returned, and all because the people who held the stake poised over these undead hearts on our behalf turned away because they were afraid of getting splinters.

Did I say earlier that we stood at the dawn of a new era? Perhaps I was wrong; for a few moments dusk and dawn can look a lot alike so you have to wait a few minutes to see if it's getting lighter or darker. In the meantime, however, I suggest you watch your neck.

Monday, November 13, 2006

Sunday with the Guys
If you know anything about my family, you know that male-famale ratio is pretty low. As in one to four. Well, if you include the animals, its three to five, but we don't. What I'm saying is that it's usually pretty estrogenetic around here. (Did I just make up a new word?)

So on Sunday Benny and one of my Poppi's old buddies came over to do manly things like hang out in the scary basement to watch the Vikings-Packers game and eat chili spicy enough to make them have to blow their noses every 4 and a half minutes. (After the kleenex were all used up there were brownies, but that's not too manly, so don't tell.) I know because I hung out in the scary basement, too; eating the spicy chili (though my nose didn't run) and dozing through the football game. It was hard sometimes, though, because of the yelling. Packer fans can be rather boisterous. And so help me, Ben, if you throw that pillow at me again I'll defenestrate you.

After a while, I felt like I was being resented. My dad told me I was cramping their style, and that if I wasn't down there, they'd be lighting farts and whatnot. I told them that if they wanted me to leave, to just say so; but then I was begged to stay. I guess I'm not the only one that feels that fart-lighting isn't manly, it's just gross.

After that, there was dance-dancing, where I was almost taken out by a stray flying fist; and then "V for Vendetta". The movie was interesting, I'll give it that.

Whooaaa...too much testosterone! It's going to take the four of us women several chick-flicks to get the basement back to normal. Where's my "You've Got Mail"?
Ja, ich spreche nur ein bisschen Deutsch
On behalf of Donald Rumsfeld and other U.S. citizens and military members to be named later, may I simply say:

Piss herauf ein Seil.

That is all.

If you want more information, however, about who is behind this in the U.S., go here.

Friday, November 10, 2006

Of the veterans

A couple of thoughts on this Veteran's Day. A little while back I heard a song on The Current that haunted the back of my mind. I heard it again this last week and it's hold grew on me so that I downloaded it from iTunes. The song is by Eliza Gilkyson, from her Paradise Hotel album, and the lyrics are taken from letters written by her ancestor, Jedidiah Huntington, who commanded troops in the Revolutionary War and fought beside George Washington. While I don't think I share many political views with Ms. Gilkyson, Jedidiah's words from the past moved me much as they must have moved her. Here are the lyrics:

Jedidiah 1777
(Eliza Gilkyson)

Jedidiah out in the snow
Walkin' the frozen trenchlines
Wet boots and his wool coat comin' apart at the seams.
Rations of hard-baked dough,
Handfuls of melting snow
What else can a man live on but his dreams?

Not twenty miles away,
in the mansions of Philadelphia,
Loyalists lay their money down on the king.
We've provision enough for the day,
but if victory were just for the wealthy
Our noble cause wouldn't be worth the hardship we're suffering.

Send the cloth for a good waistcoat,
I dream of your hearth and the fields of oat.
I awake to the drum and the trembling note of the piper.
May it please God in His great mercy,
To shelter our friends and our family.
I remain your son most faithfully,
Jedidiah

I have seen a man, who has seen a man
who has heard the king,
Tell of his intention our independence to declare.
The peace will undoubtedly bring
A great revolution in commerce;
May it be our rightful fortune to come in for a share.

My regards to a certain Miss Moore,
I've stated my honorable intentions for her;
That upon my return from this necessary war she'll be my wife.
May it please God in His great mercy
to restore the joys of domesticity.
Salutations to the family,
Jedidiah

I rejoice that the cause we're engaged in
is in the hands of an Almighty Sovereign;
Who I doubt not is accomplishing the ends of His desire.
My love to you and the fair Miss Moore;
Spare me a bottle from the cellar store,
and in my name let the contents pour,
Jedidiah

I'm moved by the sacrifice and spirit that runs through the song. Jedidiah survived the war and married Miss Moore and led a very distinguished life as the biographical link describes.

Also, just in time for Veteran's Day, I'm very happy to announce that the Gary Cooper classic "Sergeant York" became available at last on DVD this week. This is an amazing (and almost entirely true) story that is seldom remembered. I've shown the movie twice to teenage boys as part of my Fundamentals in Film series (most recently last night) and it's hard to believe the reaction it gets. Even though the movie is set in World War I, filmed in black and white and the Tennessee accents are a little thick for northern ears, the boys embraced this movie. They've laughed out loud at the many humorous scenes, grown thoughtful as the main character, Alvin York, wrestles with his faith and his duty, and rolled their eyes a bit at the love story. The discussion after the movie last night was one of our best I've had with this present group of boys.

If you've never seen this movie, or haven't watched it in a long time, you definitely need to check it out (it's available on Netflix, btw, which mailed it to me the day before it was officially released). Though it might appear at first as a rather simple story, it's an excellent tonic for our age that will encourage your faith, stimulate your thinking and deepen your appreciation for what our veterans have endured for our country.

Thursday, November 9, 2006

Oh, that other election
Somewhat overlooked in the last couple of days is the return of Daniel Ortega and the Sandinistas to power in Nicaragua. This is a sequel that has to rank up there with all the Halloween, Nightmare on Elm Street and Jason movies for horror and carnage. Ortega won in a five-way race for president by garnering 38 percent of the vote with no opponent within five percent of him. These statistics were significant because of a constitutional amendment presciently pushed through by the Sandinistas before the election that eliminated the need for a run-off if a candidate receives at least 35 percent of the vote and a 5 percent margin over the nearest competitor. Gee, it's almost as if they knew something.

Fortunately we can banish any thoughts of election shenanigans and voter suppression, despite a curious series of power outages around the country on election day, because Jimmy Carter was on hand to monitor the election, as this photo of he and Ortega looking longingly into each other's eyes documents.

Amy Ridenour has more about the Nicaraguan election and the fawning reaction of the U.S. media here and here, plus a link to an excellent analysis by Publius Pundit.

The whole thing brings back memories, good and quite bad. One of my favorites, however, is something P.J. O'Rourke included in his book Give War a Chance: Eyewitness Accounts of Mankind's Struggle against Tyranny, Injustice and Alchohol-Free Beer about his trip to Nicaragua in 1990 to report on the Ortega-Chamorro election that turned into a shocking upset in favor of Violetta Chamorro and the Nicaraguan people that left most of the media and the many Hollywood "Sandalistas" and their camp-followers who had come down for the party stunned and (even more) confused. O'Rourke himself was caught off-guard:

I hadn’t come to Nicaragua prepared for such joy. Like most readers of papers and watchers of newscasts, I thought the Sandinistas were supposed to win this one. I’m a member of the working press; you’d think I’d know better than to listen to journalists. But there’s a little bit of the pigeon in every good confidence man. I even believed the February 21st ABC-Washington Post poll that had Ortega leading Chamorro by sixteen percentage points. That is – I blush to admit this – I accepted the results of an opinion poll taken in a country where it was illegal to hold certain opinions. You can imagine the poll-taking process: “Hello, Mr. Peasant, I’m an inquisitive and frightening stranger. God knows who I work for. Would you care to ostensibly support the dictatorship which controls every facet of your existence, or shall we put you down as in favor of the UNO opposition and just tear up your ration card right here and now?”

Ortega was a staunch supporter and favorite of Cuba in his first reign, and an unabashed supporter and embracer of terrorism, and was heavily supported by Venezuelan President and would-be exorcist Hugo Chavez this go-round. Hmmm — Hugo and Daniel buddy-buddy in Central America and Hugo (who wants weapons) and Kim Jong-il (who wants oil and somebody to take him seriously) already exchanging Valentines. Hey, Congress: how quick can we get that wall built? (Uh-oh).

Wednesday, November 8, 2006

Onward and upward

I'm sorry I'm late posting today, but with the results of the elections I've been busy all day putting my house on the market and getting ready to move to Australia. ;^ )

I'm disappointed, to be sure, but not discouraged or depressed. It's not that I don't think it matters who's in office (though at times one can be hard-pressed to tell the difference), or that the country isn't in for rough patch for awhile, but I take solace that my happiness and even my sustenance isn't dependent on who's sitting where in whatever Capitol building. There is a higher authority on a much higher throne who's mandate is not affected by poll or policy.

I've not posted much about politics on this blog, and that's not an accident. I definitely have my "side" and I'm strong in my beliefs and convictions that the government that governs best, governs least, but I long ago gave up on the quaint notion that there were many in authority in either of the major parties who shared these convictions with me. There was a time, however, when I was totally immersed, and gave up large and important chunks of my life to fight the good fight, going to caucuses, lit-dropping, planting signs, managing a campaign, serving as a delegate many times, once even making it to the state convention. The good fight, however, often was with the leadership of my supposedly righteous party who's most fundamental concern was with getting their guy (or gal) in office simply because he or she wasn't the other party's guy or gal. Who they were or what they really stood for (or would go along with) wasn't as important as having the right letters follow the name of the office-holder.

Jaded? No, not really. Once it sunk in that it was a game for both sides to play King of the Middle, I almost felt liberated. I realized that, for me, it made more sense to turn my efforts to the micro, rather than macro; to try and stir up the desire and the need for self-government in others one or two lives at a time and - as those lives changed - have faith that it might trickle up and someday move the middle closer to me. Others have felt different callings and I admire those who have gone to the front lines of the political battles as volunteers and officers, throwing themselves into the long and thankless hours that are needed to put a team on the field. We need those true believers on the wall. Many are bloggers and friends and I pray for their courage and their healing and their peace. They have the passion and the insight and, like so much else, I leave the commentary mainly to them.

As ugly as the process has become, and as the results we've just experienced are, I confess to a flicker of optimism. Everything is educational, and it doesn't really matter if you learn something the hard way or the easy way as long as you do, in fact, learn. I find it ironic that a certain group emerged from the political darkness a dozen years ago and won on a promise to be different and ultimately became so enamored with "winning" that they forgot how to do it. All the compromises, all the "outreach" they did out of fear of not being "electable" came back to bite them in their spongy and expanding asses.

So, a cleansing breath, and let the other side shoot themselves in the foot for a little while. There's alway plenty of low-hanging fruit on either side that will ripen into scandal; let those guys draw the flies for awhile and let's get back to basics, and let's hope that there will still be people willing to go back up on that wall when the time comes.

Tuesday, November 7, 2006

More than sports ... as opposed to "more-on" sports

One of my favorite on-line sports features is the Tuesday Morning Quarterback (TMQ) on ESPN.com I've linked the author, Gregg Easterbrook before because he has a creative and insightful take on sportswriting often makes me say, "Yeah, why is that?" (Today's main feature on why the NFL should abolish Injured Reserve and the 53-man limited roster is breathtaking.) What I really like, however, is his tangential observations on our culture, and today's (always) lengthy entree had several zingers.

Here's his take on the dueling attack ads in Virginia senate race:

REPUBLICAN ATTACK AD
Soft, lilting female voice. Because voters worry that Republicans are too right-wing, the voice-over in Republican attack ads is always a sweet, reasonable-sounding woman.

"Did you know that Jim Webb reads novels? That he thinks about sex? Jim Webb has never denied thinking about sex! Jim Webb has been known to receive money. The exact amount of money he has received has never been disclosed! Many drug dealers drive their cars on highways, and Jim Webb drives his car on highways. So what's the difference between Jim Webb and a drug dealer? While serving in the Vietnam War, Webb frequently used profanity, and is rumored to have thought about sex. When five brave firefighters died trying to stop the California wildfire, Jim Webb did nothing to rescue them -- nothing! As a Democrat, Jim Webb advocates mandatory homosexuality, tax-funded Cadillacs for welfare recipients, the abolition of religion, surrendering our country to the United Nations and letting Saddam Hussein out of jail on a technicality. If Jim Webb is elected, Osama bin Laden will be placed in control of the United States military. Why won't Jim Webb release the details of his thoughts?"

DEMOCRATIC ATTACK AD
Booming, macho voice. Because voters worry that Democrats are too squishy, the voice-over in Democratic attack ads always sounds like a steroid-swilling bodybuilder.

"Maybe George Allen is no longer a Satan-worshipper, but many Satan-worshippers are skilled at hiding their true allegiance. The postman, the school principal -- can you be sure they are not Satan worshippers? Can you be sure George Allen is not? As a Republican, George Allen favors mandatory pregnancy, nuclear war against Canada, and the resumption of the Atlantic slave trade. George Allen never has explained adequately where he was on May 23, 1983. Investigators have found many documents related to George Allen. George Allen has been observed leaving meetings. Some of these meetings occurred in private! If George Allen is re-elected, major oil companies will charge for gasoline. George Allen has never denied that George W. Bush is President of the United States. George Allen, George Bush. Powerful insiders don't want you to know that both have the same first name!"


Speaking of elections, here's this (I think) satirical note:

Washington, D.C. -- Nov. 7: Former president Jimmy Carter leads a team of international observers that will monitor elections in the United States today. Observers from Nicaragua, Guatemala, North Korea, Mexico, Congo, Nigeria, Pakistan and the West Bank will watch polling places for signs of fraud or suppression of the vote. In recent years, Carter has led many international teams to monitor elections in fledgling democracies plagued by voting scandals. This is Carter's first election-monitoring mission to the United States itself. International observers wearing blue armbands will be stationed at polling places across Florida, Ohio, Illinois and Nevada. "We hope to help the American people vote freely and see their votes counted," Nicaraguan team member Daniel Ortega told the Associated Press. Observation team member Olusegun Obasanjo of Nigeria said, "Once America learns to hold elections without irregularities, further intervention by the international community should no longer be necessary."

He also had an interesting proposal on how to clean up the abuse of the public trough in Washington, D.C. that comes from lobbying and earmarking. Somehow his idea sounds kind of un-American, but I like it:

Related point: Jodi Rudoren and Aron Philhofer of the New York Times recently reported that 1,421 state and local governments have hired Washington lobbyists, who in 2004 spent $110 million on lobbying in order get more than $60 billion designated as "earmarks," or special budget favors to specific places or programs. That is to say, $110 million in state and local tax money was expended to divert $60 billion in federal tax money -- most of which came from people who live in states and cities, state and local taxpayers being the sources of most federal taxes. To get these favors, state and local governments hire as lobbyists former members of Congress or former congressional staffers, who then use their insider status to fleece the taxpayer. This is a classic "sliver strategy" -- Congress hands out $60 billion in favors so that cronies of members of Congress can rake in $110 million in lobbying fees. Because what goes directly into the cronies' pockets is only a small sliver of the overall waste, the sliver goes unnoted. I bet there is bipartisan consensus that Republicans and Democrats alike both don't want this investigated, either!

Wouldn't taxpayers come out way ahead if the salaries of members of Congress were raised to, say, $1 million per year, but in return all forms of outside income were banned for senators and representatives while retired members were permanently banned from lobbying? Raising congressional salaries to $1 million per year would cost the federal taxpayer $535 million -- a bargain compared to $60 billion in earmarks and other wasteful spending that Congress approves for reasons of cronyism.

Finally, after seeing this item in TMQ, I'm predicting a surge in new email spam offers for the following "enhancement":

Dear, the Garage Enhancement Truck Is Here: Recently TMQ included an item about fancy garage appliances as the new frontier in suburban acquisitiveness. How soon, I asked, until garage renovation strikes? Answer: not long! Many readers, including Jayne Mulholland of Charleston, S.C., alerted me to this new company, Premiere Garage, which calls itself "The Leader in Garage Enhancement." Let's hope that's natural garage enhancement! Check the company's photos, which showcase spotless garages unlike any that have ever existed in human history. These garages remind you of car ads that feature a guy in a convertible roaring down the open road with not one single other vehicle anywhere for miles around. The Premiere Garage FAQs page has this exchange:

"Q. My garage is full of stuff. What do we do with it while the floor is being coated?"

"A. It is the homeowners' responsibility to remove all possessions from the garage."

This may look like I've lifted his whole column, but it's probably only about 25% of his weekly exposition. Read the whole thing to find out more about smart is it, really, to have the world's largest container ship (191,000 tons, more than twice that of a Nimitz-class supercarrier) crewed and controlled by just 19 people, plus sections entitled "News from the Edge of the Solar System" and "News from the Edge of the Universe", plus a heaping-helping of inside-football tactics and the ever-popular "NFL Cheerleader of the Week" offering.

Monday, November 6, 2006

Pants for the Victory Dance
I have a new favorite tv commercial. It's for Haggar slacks with the flexible waistband. Granted, that's not a new concept, but the way the pants were advertised yesterday is new. The commercial starts out looking like a home improvement show with a couple of average-looking guys my age welcoming us back to the show and today's project: How to get rid of your daughter's worthless boyfriend (some young slob with a game-controller in his hand is shown sprawled across Dad's couch).

Of course, the guy-mantra I grew up with is "the right tool for the right job" and in the case of this commercial that means you're going to want the Haggar slacks with the (whatever-they-call-it) waistband, that stretches and flexes with you even if you're moving vigorously, as one of the guys demonstrates by grabbing the slob and propelling him through a large open window, saying that the flexible waistband comes in handy "when you gotta grab a squirmy one."

While the commercial is funny, the thing that really caught my attention is that Haggar is embracing its image as being "older-guy" pants. This is a daring strategy. Even though there are a lot more older guys around now than there are young skinny-waisted whippersnappers, it doesn't necessarily mean that we embrace the physical changes in our lives, especially being part of the generation that has been sold youth for the the past 30 years. That's why you don't see a lot of prime-time commercials selling ear and nose-hair trimmers, and why ads for Viagra and Cialis feature robust, virile-looking men with a touch of gray throwing footballs or, I don't know, gutting a grizzly bear or something and not some balding, paunchy guy struggling to twist the cap off the bottle with his Cheetos-stained and arthritic fingers.

Through humor and attitude I think I'm coming to grips with my faithful but aging and sometimes gimpy body, and it's kind of fun to see Haggar doing the same and talking right at me instead of down to me or telling me I can still make people think I'm young by wearing the right kind of stylish pants. I don't remember the last time I had any Haggar pants — it might have been a pair my mom bought me when I was in high school. Before this commercial I wouldn't have thought of Haggar when it was time to buy pants, but now I think I might buy some. Better yet:

Note to the Mall Diva: since you're concerned about my pants (see post below), you might want to get me a couple of pair of these for Christmas. Darker colors, please, because the blood stains don't show up as much.

Sunday, November 5, 2006

What will become of us?
Thursday night I came home from work, and the house was quiet. Bonita was talking on the phone in the living room, and I heard a ticka-ticka coming from the basement which meant my dad was blogging.

I found a cup of coffee sitting on the counter, getting cold.
I yelled downstairs, "Dad! Did mom make you some coffee?"
"Oh, dang it! I forgot about that."
He came upstairs and I asked him where Tiger Lilly was.
"Oh, dang it! I forgot to pick her up from tae kwon do!"

You know, sometimes I think he just gets lost in his own little world. One of these days I'm going to ask him where his pants are just to see if he says "Oh, dang it! I forgot!"

Yes, yes, it all seems very funny right now, but what if he forgets something really important? Like my birthday? Yeah, I know, as if I'd ever let anyone forget that. But what if?

...

Anyway,last night I decided to watch one of my favorite movies (Elf). So I got all comfy in my pajamas and settled down in the basement with my sister and my cat when my friend calls me and asks if I want to go to the Wild game.

"What time do we have to leave?"
"Uhh..Right now."

So I ditched my sister and Buddy the Elf, changed my clothes and had some fun at the hockey game. It's too bad we lost.

Ah, well, I know they can do better next time. Go, Wild!

Friday, November 3, 2006

Bwa-ha-ha!
I use Powerblogs as my blogging service and I've been very happy with it. The platform offers a lot of nice features for just $5 a month, and whenever I've screwed something up or had a problem I've been able to email my man Chris at Powerblogs HQ and he takes care of it promptly. One of the things I've noticed in our communications back and forth is that at the bottom of Chris's emails is always a philosophical quote from something called Evil Overlord.com. Each of these statements is from a list of things that any aspiring evil overlord should be sure to do when he (or she) comes to power to ensure that do-gooders don't undo all their hard work.

Since there are some who think this blog just isn't evil enough I thought I'd research this Evil Overlord thingy and tease you with some of the 100 top suggestions. Not all of them, of course. If you want to read those in their entirety you'll have to follow the link. (Pardon me while I work on my maniacal laugh — A-henh-henh-ha! How's that? No? Oh well).

Anyway, check out the link above. It's for your own good, really, because I know Tiger Lilly is sure to be memorizing every detail.

From the site:

Being an Evil Overlord seems to be a good career choice. It pays well, there are all sorts of perks and you can set your own hours. However every Evil Overlord I've read about in books or seen in movies invariably gets overthrown and destroyed in the end. I've noticed that no matter whether they are barbarian lords, deranged wizards, mad scientists or alien invaders, they always seem to make the same basic mistakes every single time. With that in mind, allow me to present...

The Top 100 Things I'd Do If I Ever Became An Evil Overlord

  1. My Legions of Terror will have helmets with clear plexiglass visors, not face-concealing ones.

  2. My ventilation ducts will be too small to crawl through.

  3. My noble half-brother whose throne I usurped will be killed, not kept anonymously imprisoned in a forgotten cell of my dungeon.

  4. Shooting is not too good for my enemies.

  5. The artifact which is the source of my power will not be kept on the Mountain of Despair beyond the River of Fire guarded by the Dragons of Eternity. It will be in my safe-deposit box. The same applies to the object which is my one weakness.

  6. I will not gloat over my enemies' predicament before killing them.

  7. When I've captured my adversary and he says, "Look, before you kill me, will you at least tell me what this is all about?" I'll say, "No." and shoot him. No, on second thought I'll shoot him then say "No."

  8. After I kidnap the beautiful princess, we will be married immediately in a quiet civil ceremony, not a lavish spectacle in three weeks' time during which the final phase of my plan will be carried out.

  9. I will not include a self-destruct mechanism unless absolutely necessary. If it is necessary, it will not be a large red button labelled "Danger: Do Not Push". The big red button marked "Do Not Push" will instead trigger a spray of bullets on anyone stupid enough to disregard it. Similarly, the ON/OFF switch will not clearly be labelled as such.

  10. I will not interrogate my enemies in the inner sanctum — a small hotel well outside my borders will work just as well.

  11. I will be secure in my superiority. Therefore, I will feel no need to prove it by leaving clues in the form of riddles or leaving my weaker enemies alive to show they pose no threat.

  12. One of my advisors will be an average five-year-old child. Any flaws in my plan that he is able to spot will be corrected before implementation.

  13. All slain enemies will be cremated, or at least have several rounds of ammunition emptied into them, not left for dead at the bottom of the cliff. The announcement of their deaths, as well as any accompanying celebration, will be deferred until after the aforementioned disposal.

  14. The hero is not entitled to a last kiss, a last cigarette, or any other form of last request.

  15. I will never employ any device with a digital countdown. If I find that such a device is absolutely unavoidable, I will set it to activate when the counter reaches 117 and the hero is just putting his plan into operation.

  16. I will never utter the sentence "But before I kill you, there's just one thing I want to know."

  17. When I employ people as advisors, I will occasionally listen to their advice.

  18. I will not have a son. Although his laughably under-planned attempt to usurp power would easily fail, it would provide a fatal distraction at a crucial point in time.

  19. I will not have a daughter. She would be as beautiful as she was evil, but one look at the hero's rugged countenance and she'd betray her own father.

  20. Despite its proven stress-relieving effect, I will not indulge in maniacal laughter. When so occupied, it's too easy to miss unexpected developments that a more attentive individual could adjust to accordingly.


Thursday, November 2, 2006

Do you think Aesop might be Over Their Heads?


The family watched Over the Hedge the other night. It was amusing enough, but I couldn't help but notice a certain fable-like quality to the story. I wouldn't exactly put this movie into the Fundamentals in Film series, I thought I'd share my observations.

If you haven't seen the movie, the latest animated film from the people who brought us Shrek, it's the story of a rather amoral raccoon, RJ (voice of Bruce Willis) who's snack-thieving ways get him in big trouble with a large and implacable bear when he accidentally causes the bear's food stash to be destroyed. To save himself, RJ must replace everything by a (literal) deadline. While on his quest he comes across a collection of naive woodland animals gently led by a turtle named Vern (Gary Shandling).

Vern and his friends have just awoken from their winter hibernation to find that their forest home has been encircled by a suburban housing development. Initially confused and terrified, they don't know what to do. RJ, well-acquainted with the appetites and excesses of humans and seeing a way to con the other animals into helping him with his mission, convinces them that the easy life is at hand and all the delicious food they could ever want is literally on their doorstep.

Vern is slow but sensible and doesn't trust RJ or the new life he promises, even though RJ initially delivers and the other animals are thrilled with the potato chips, cookies and pizza scraps they've tasted ("It tastes good, so it must be good for you!"). Vern wants to keep to their old ways and food, but he is ignored and even becomes the butt (literally) of the movie's humor. The rest of the animals are soon enthusiastically racing through the neighborhood gathering food and following RJ's directions without knowing his real purpose. Of course, disaster ultimately looms and is narrowly averted but not without everyone learning what is Really Important, blah-bitty blah blah. <