The Night Writer http://thenightwriterblog.powerblogs.com/ Illuminating fun, faith, family and foolishness. en-us 2008-02-10T05:02+00:00 Nothing to see here http://thenightwriterblog.powerblogs.com/posts/1189052554.shtml Driving to a dentist appointment and then to work this morning I heard two news reports on KFAN summarizing the weekend shootings in Colorado. Each time the report said that the... The Night Writer 2007-12-14T04:12+00:00 treatment she'd already experienced from her unintended notoriety.

Later, going onto CNN.com and FOXnews.com, however, I discovered that not only had Ms. Assam disappeared from the front page, so had the entire story. A search of both sites turned up several stories from December 10 and 11 and one or two from the 12th but nothing posted today. Yes, time and the news march on and there's literally fresh meat every day, but it sure seems as if this story faded fast, especially when you think of the ongoing coverage that followed the recent Omaha mall shooting (there's still stories appearing this week) and the earlier Virginia Tech massacre. VT in particular brought many ongoing articles about the killer's background, the victims and the vulnerability of the public. Now it seems, for the most part, that the "public's right to know" is being under-served in comparison. That's a good thing if it means that the media has learned to tread more respectfully around the lives of people suddenly thrust into tragedy who now find their suffering part of the nation's entertainment menu.

Or are there other reasons? Think of it, you've got a madman "loner", multiple guns, "assault rifles," revenge motives, dead white women (always good for two or three nights of headlines and at least one Special Report on Fox) and beautiful blondes — you'd think Colorado would be covered with TV vans, news choppers and producers looking for anyone to sign away the movie rights. And all of this while there's a TV-writer's strike going on. Is the story being dismissed with a shrug because mass shootings are now so commonplace? That shouldn't be an issue this time because you've got the perfect "man bites dog" novelty angle — an armed private citizen stopped the killer.

Say, you don't think this has quickly faded because an armed private citizen ... nah, it can't be that.

It's probably just as well. First, Jeanne Assam was mugged by the media and her former employer (isn't it funny how chatty the Minneapolis Police Department is getting on personnel matters and when slandering innocent victims of crimes like Mark Loesch) and then Youth With a Mission (YWAM) gets called a cult in the most recent story on the Fox site:

Several former missionaries have accused YWAM (generally pronounced "Why-Wam") of being a cult that uses brainwashing methods.

Rick Ross, founder of the Ross Institute of New Jersey, which tracks cults, does not agree.

"Youth With a Mission is not a cult," he said. "However, I have received very serious complaints about Youth With a Mission from former staffers, family members and also others concerned, such as Christian clergy."

Rev. Jonathan Bonk, the director of the Overseas Ministries Study Center in New Haven, Conn., said that missions like those YWAM offers appeal to those looking for something other than the consumerist lifestyle.

"They want to be attached to a cosmic project that gives their little lives some kind of sense of purpose or meaning," Bonk said.

"They want to be attached to a cosmic project that gives their little lives some kind of sense of purpose or meaning." Great, first smear a hero, then sneer at the victims. Matthew Murray writes "You Christians have got it coming" and from the media pews comes a hearty "Amen."

To give credit where it is due, the Denver Post has done a very good job of developing the story and bringing additional information to light, including a story that described how Murray was able to get his weapons and included a report of an earlier incident he had had with staffers at New Life Church. The paper also reports on how one of the staffers killed at YWAM had once been as spooky as Murray, and has a touching story about how the Christian families of the killer and the victims had reached out to each other.

Finally, I will refer you to the Anderson Cooper interview with a wounded witness of the New Life shooting that also includes a very interesting discussion with Murray's one-time roommate at YWAM.

Update:

Here's another good article from the Denver Post that looks at more of Assam's past than just the Minneapolis PD incident. ]]> Loving your neighbor in Inver Grove Heights http://thenightwriterblog.powerblogs.com/posts/1191209018.shtml Last week the Inver Grove Heights City Council met to hear from the public regarding a new property maintenance ordinance aimed at instituting certain appearance, maintenance and lawn-care standards for... The Night Writer 2007-10-01T19:10+00:00 Inver Grove Heights City Council met to hear from the public regarding a new property maintenance ordinance aimed at instituting certain appearance, maintenance and lawn-care standards for private homes. As with many laws, especially those regarding private property, this ordinance wasn't aimed at defining or protecting an owner's property rights, but at criminalizing poor or indifferent citizenship. Of course, it's all for a good cause: "It's for the children," one of the proponents said.

Apparently, it's more harmful for children to see a messy yard than it is for them to see adults taking their neighbors to court to resolve a problem instead of pitching in to help.

As a property-owner I know how discouraging and aggravating it can be to share a neighborhood — or even a property-line — with an "eye-sore" home and lot. I am much more concerned, however, with the ever-increasing encroachments on property rights, typically in the name of "doing good." From Kelo, to smoking bans, to how high you let the grass grow, it's an ever-expanding power-grab passed off as being for the common good without any real examination of how much good — or how much harm — is actually being done. (On a side-note, I heard one news-reader on KFAN this a.m. referring to the new state-wide smoking ban in bars and restaurants, say the ban "does not apply to private homes at this time" — suggesting, what?)

In this particular case, this issue for me is not just a legal or conservative one about rights and what you can get people to go along with, it is a moral and Biblical one as well. Usually it seems that if you raise a moral issue these days it's assumed that you want to impose some narrow-minded "thou shalt not" on other people. In this case the "thou shalt nots" being imposed are coming from the larger public and what's being missed is the "thou shall" Biblical instruction. You know, the one that "thou shall love thy neighbor as thyself." Note, that doesn't say "love they neighbor only if thy neighbor is a believer," nor does it say "if you are a believer, thou shall love thy neighbor."

What if that neighbor with the dilapidated house or junky yard is someone struggling just to make ends meet and can't afford to make the improvements to the paint or siding that the community deems to be necessary? What if that neighbor is working two or three jobs and might skip mowing the lawn from time to time? What if your neighbors are an elderly couple who don't have the physical, let alone financial, resources to maintain the property but are trying to live independently? Shall we just have our pubic servants, the police, march up to the door and slap a citation on it? Certainly it would be "legal." Or, alternatively, shall we walk up to the door in person, knock on it and say, "Hi, you may not know me but I'm your next-door neighbor and I was wondering if there was something I could do to help?"

Ok, so what if that neighbor is a lazy bum who's perfectly capable of maintaining his house or yard, or is someone who just likes to use old washing machines as lawn statuary? Well, it could be that your offer might not be well-received, or that your neighbor might think that you're the nutjob. But if a succession of people approached him or her over time and offered to help (as opposed to demanding that he or she "straighten up") what effect could that have? The neighbor would know that people are paying attention, that they care about the neighborhood and their property values, and that they're willing to try to help first rather than condemn. He may not change his attitude completely but he may be motivated to try to make some improvements (even grudgingly) or even accept an offer of help. Which approach do you think ultimately contributes to a better neighborhood?

If that is starting to sound like a good idea to you, but you're thinking, "yeah, why can't the government do something to help that guy?" then you're still missing the point. A lot of the problems we're facing in our communities come from the fact that we've allocated to the government the responsibility of looking out for the well-being of those around us, of loving our neighbors. Sure, we mean to "do good" by passing new laws and taxes but we're merely passing off our personal responsibility to do good to another, impersonal (and usually less efficient) entity.

Now it could be that your neighbor is a loser with no conscience or sense of shame who will readily accept help from you and your neighbor and just sit back and figure someone will always bail him out and never lift a finger himself. There's certainly precedent for that happening when the help comes from a faceless government, but may not be so common when there are real faces involved. It's worth a try at least to see if you can make a difference, and if someone is totally resistant or irresponsible there are other Biblical examples of how to deal with an unrepentent individual (and no, they don't involve stoning — I'm thinking Matthew 18:15-17).

Furthermore, do we know how many people might fall into this latter category, and might it be worthwhile to figure it out before writing an ordinance or passing a law? At the Inver Grove Heights meeting, one person asked the Council how many complaints had been filed regarding nuisance properties. The answer was 160. The questioner then asked how many private homes were in Inver Grove Heights. The Council and the proponents of the ordinance didn't know.

How many of the complaints referred to the same property? They didn't know.

How many complaints had been filed by the same person? They didn't know.

For the time being, the Council has decided to proceed with a stripped down version of the ordinance that regulates junk, open storage, woodpiles and similar eyesores but not the outside condition of houses and other buildings. It was much less than ordinance proponents were hoping for, and the issue is still alive. A second reading of the ordinance is scheduled for the next Council meeting on October 8. ]]> But, but, but ... oh boy, now I'm in trouble http://thenightwriterblog.powerblogs.com/posts/1189104791.shtml It was an honor for me to be invited to be a contributing writer to the new Minnesota group blog True North. I don't write frequently or deeply about politics... The Night Writer 2007-09-06T18:09+00:00 True North. I don't write frequently or deeply about politics but I get a good post off every now and then about the Minnesota scene or cultural anomalies and/or artifacts. To be told I had "chops" and ought to be a part of this new venture made me blush, avert my eyes and shyly shuffle my mouse. I knew I was going to have to live up to being part of a talented and volatile company of bloggers, and I didn't know if I would fit in.

Just as nominees to a new political administration are flipped and grilled and have their pasts treated as merely so many prophetic entrails, I fear that in the wake of "Butt-Cheekgate" my past indiscretions will be my undoing. Therefore, in an effort to be upfront and to forestall the endless rounds of "gotcha" journalism, I want to forthrightly confess that I, too, have used similar wording on my blog. Not only that, but in a headline as well.

Please understand, I was much younger then and it all seemed like a bit of a harmless lark. Never in a million years would I have suspected that it would come back to haunt me like this and cause such embarrassment to my friends and family. To them, and anyone who I may have offended, I sincerely apologize. Not that I'm really like Learned Foot, of course. I mean, the idea that he'd not just push the nascent envelope but rip through it like a bottle rocket was as safe a bet as taking the "under" on how many games Rondell White would play before getting hurt this year. Still, I think I'm going to shelve the post I was working on comparing Nick Coleman to a dingleberry.

If that's not repentance, I don't know what is.
]]> Minnesota's newest natural resource http://thenightwriterblog.powerblogs.com/posts/1188585540.shtml ... The Night Writer 2007-08-31T18:08+00:00


True North? Because in Minnesota it's not just the mosquitos that get under your skin. Because all the loons don't stay at the lake — many run for office or write editorials. Because it's the land of 10,000 lakes and even more taxes, where "conservative" legislators are as elusive as walleye, and put up about as much fight. Because "Minnesota Nice" really isn't so if you don't get along with Nanny.

And because ice fishing isn't as much fun as you might think.

True North. Coming September 1. You betcha.
]]> The bridges of Minneapolis and San Luis Rey, and the Tower of Siloam http://thenightwriterblog.powerblogs.com/posts/1186248210.shtml Who, what, when, where? Those are the first things we want to know when a disaster makes the news. Close on their heels comes the question hardest to answer: Why?... The Night Writer 2007-08-10T04:08+00:00
That question breaks into two parts, the physical and the metaphysical. Why did the bridge fail structurally, and why were these particular people apportioned to survive, die or be injured? The first question will eventually be known to the millimeter; the second will remain fuzzy. Implicit in the second one, however, is the fear that everything is random, that there is no justice, or that justice is applied on a scale so grand that we can't calculate it; either way we are left with uncertainty as to just what measure is due us personally. The thing is, we want there to be a reason and order to things, and optimistically assume (or hope) that our own accounts will balance to the "good"; promising or justifying our own deliverance from calamity.

We easily extend our version of grace to others (as long as they're victims and not members of the opposition party), generously judging them good or innocent by the most general of categories: he was a "nice guy", she was a young mother. "Why do bad things happen to good people?" we cry. Other people, or other times, might view calamity as judgment or karmic justice.

Similarly, was it chance or God's plan that resulted in the deaths in the collapse of the 35W bridge in Minneapolis? Was it God's indifference that lead to the fall, or God's providence that the calamity was not more catastrophic? If there is such a "goodness" scale, by what measure can the survivors claim deliverance and what comfort can be given to the families of those who didn't? How can a former missionary go missing while a child abuser survives?

People didn't start asking these questions just when President Bush took office, either. In his 1927 novel, "The Bridge at San Luis Rey," Thornton Wilder tackles similar questions and circumstances in the person of Brother Juniper who tries to ascertain the central failing in the lives of five people who perish when the titular bridge falls into a chasm. (He could come to no conclusion). Going back a bit further, in John 9:2, Jesus was asked about a blind man, "Who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?"

“Neither this man nor his parents sinned,” said Jesus, “but this happened so that the work of God might be displayed in his life.” Whereupon he made mud and put it in the blind man's eyes and then sent him to wash in the pool of Siloam, healing his blindness. Interestingly, Siloam is mentioned again in Luke 13 when people suggest to Jesus that calamity overcame certain people as a judgment. His response: "... those eighteen on whom the tower in Siloam fell and killed them, do you think that they were worse sinners than all other men who dwelt in Jerusalem? I tell you, no! But unless you repent, you too will all perish."

Or, (excuse my jump in character but not in context), in the words of Clint Eastwood in Unforgiven, "We've all got it coming." The point being made was that no one is innocent, but each may come to the revelation of salvation by grace; by the work of God, not man.

I'm not trying to be dark. In fact, I believe that there is an order and justice in the universe even if we can't see it all at once. I believe that because, in fact, we are able to see beauty and justice from time to time. If it weren't so, all would be chaos and despair. Instead, in the midst of the refining fire of a disaster there are gleaming streaks of gold rising through all the impurities; the acts of courage, altruism and goodness in the survivors and rescuers (perhaps even unplumbed in their lives up until that point), and of a community pulling together in empathy and faith.

Bridges are aspirational; tangibly they are an example of our ability to overcome an obstacle to achieve what we want. The failure of one is not just a challenge to getting what we want, it is a repudiation of our ability to even conceive of it; the cutting of the tight rope woven of our doctrines that we walk to find our own salvation. In Mark Helprin's book "Winter's Tale" the allegorical and eternal Jackson Mead, an engineer representing either Lucifer or man (I go back and forth on this), strives to bend steel, nature and his will into casting a tremendous bridge of light to Heaven that — like our human understanding — touches the far shore for a moment and falls. Yet one of the messages of the book is that the balances are exact; and one thing cannot fall without something else rising and even more gloriously.

The 35W bridge fell in a crush of broken steel, concrete and bodies — and though the dust sought to obscure it, we could suddenly see something clearly: we are the bridges, standing in or reaching across the gap for and to one another.

Standing, always. ]]>